ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2018
[Long-term prognosis of Peters anomaly].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Optical rehabilitation and pediatric ophthalmological care following keratoplasty for childhood corneal opacities].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022Review
- [Infant with bilateral corneal opacity and aniridia].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Article
- [Keratoplasty in children : Indications and results].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020Review
- [Combined XEN and Baerveldt implant-principles and management of complications].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeters anomaly normally presents in early childhood. Common features are central corneal opacities and dysgeneses of the anterior eye segment. Early surgery is commonly warranted to prevent deep amblyopia or because of severe glaucoma. We herein present the clinical outcomes of all patients treated in the Eye Center of the Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg since 2005. Emphasis is placed on the Peters subtype.
methodsData were collected retrospectively by means of chart review. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate visual prognosis, the indication for keratoplasty, and the incidence of retinal detachment.
resultsA total of 23 patients were identified. Subtype distribution was 40% type 1, 50% type 2, and 10% Peters plus syndrome. Ten patients were female (45%). Mean age at first presentation was 5 years; mean follow-up period censored in terms of eyeball preservation was 2 years (0 months-8 years). At mean follow-up, 40.5% of all patients had undergone at least one keratoplasty (up to six per eye); 43% had undergone glaucoma surgery (cylophotocoagulation, trabeculectomy, implants) at this time. Important complications were retinal detachment (31%) and phthisis bulbi (15%). After 4 years, visual acuity in the better eye was at most 0.05 in every second patient.
conclusionPrognosis of visual acuity in Peters anomaly is poor. It is generally not possible to restore visual function in the long run, i. e., reading-grade visual acuity is rarely achieved. Surgical interventions are associated with a high risk of severe complications. Therefore, the young patients should be connected to institutions for visually impaired persons at an early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.