Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484787›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2017

[Minilaparoscopy with 5 mm optics and 3 mm trocars].

J Schmidt

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J SchmidtKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Krankenhaus Landshut-Achdorf, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus TU München, Achdorfer Weg 3, 84036, Landshut, Deutschland. johannes.schmidt@lakumed.de.
University of Applied Sciences Landshut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minilaparoscopy was introduced already 20 years ago. In spite of reduced diameter, technical performance of modern trocars and instruments has improved substantially. While carrying out a minilaparoscopic procedure, the required position of the trocars and the surgical strategy remain the same. The most important step towards minilaparoscopy is reduction of the diameter of the laparoscopes from 10 to 5 mm. The 5 mm laparoscopes show high resolution and transport enough energy to properly illuminate the surgical field. Minilaparoscopic procedures help to improve cosmetic results and reduce postoperative pain, but postoperative complication rates are not affected. Use of one 5 mm trocar causes higher tissue tension than two 3 mm trocars and an additionally placed 3 mm trocar will not increase the complication rate. Therefore, a reduced risk of trocar hernia formation may be expected when a minilaparoscopic approach is used. Efficiency has been proven for minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernioplasty (TAPP/TEP) whereas overall available evidence across the literature remains poor. Further miniaturization is linked directly to video editing: physical limitations in classic optic systems have already been reached; therefore, reduction of optical chip systems could be a possible alternative.

Indexed as

Optics and PhotonicsSurgical InstrumentsAppendectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicEquipment DesignEstheticsHerniorrhaphyHumansLaparoscopyMiniaturizationMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainComplication rateCosmetic resultsInstrumentsOptic systemsPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID28484787
OpenAlexW2614023148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.