ArticleRoyal Society open science2017
PPIMpred: a web server for high-throughput screening of small molecules targeting protein-protein interaction.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alphappimi: a comprehensive deep learning framework for predicting PPI-modulator interactions.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- A Random Forest Model for Peptide Classification Based on Virtual Docking Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Structure-based assessment and druggability classification of protein-protein interaction sites.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Protein-protein interaction modulators: advances, successes and remaining challenges.Biophysical reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PPIMpred is a web server that allows high-throughput screening of small molecules for targeting specific protein-protein interactions, namely Mdm2/P53, Bcl2/Bak and c-Myc/Max. Three different kernels of support vector machine (SVM), namely, linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF), and two other machine learning techniques including Naive Bayes and Random Forest were used to train the models. A fivefold cross-validation technique was used to measure the performance of these classifiers. The RBF kernel of SVM outperformed and/or was comparable with all other methods with accuracy values of 83%, 79% and 90% for Mdm2/P53, Bcl2/Bak and c-Myc/Max, respectively. About 80% of the predicted SVM scores of training/testing datasets from Mdm2/P53 and Bcl2/Bak have significant IC50 values and docking scores. The proposed models achieved an accuracy of 66-90% with blind sets. The three mentioned (Mdm2/P53, Bcl2/Bak and c-Myc/Max) proposed models were screened in a large dataset of 265 242 small chemicals from National Cancer Institute open database. To further realize the robustness of this approach, hits with high and random SVM scores were used for molecular docking in AutoDock Vina wherein the molecules with high and random predicted SVM scores yielded moderately significant docking scores (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.