ArticleISBT science series2017
Developing new pharmacotherapeutic approaches to treating sickle-cell disease.
Article in ISBT science series, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05530239 (Single-center Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single-center Pilot Study: Nano-rheological Biomarkers for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Versus Control Subjects (Other Constitutional Red Blood Cell Diseases and Healthy Subjects)
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leg ulcer induced by hydroxycarbamide in sickle cell disease: What is the therapeutic impact?International wound journal · 2019Article
- Review
- New Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Survival for patients with SCD has been prolonged by improvements in supportive care, including vaccinations, antibiotic prophylaxis, and overall medical management, including tra nsfusion. However, there remains only one approved, partially effective drug for sickle cell disease-hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide). The world desperately needs better ways of both treating and preventing the recurrent painful vaso-occlusive episodes pathognomonic of sickle cell disease as well as the end-organ damage that still leads inexorably to severely shortened life expectancies throughout the world. Based on accumulating knowledge about how the abnormal red blood cells of sickle cell disease cause the double scourge of acute painful episodes and progressive end-organ damage, both pharmaceutical enterprises and individual investigators are now pursuing multiple new avenues for treating sickle cell disease. As a result, many compounds are in active development, both in preclinical models as well as in phase I, II, and III clinical trials. These agents target many pathophysiologic processes thought to be critical in sickle cell disease, including the chemical and physical behavior of haemoglobin S, cell adhesion, coagulation pathways, platelet activation, inflammatory pathways, and upregulation of haemoglobin F expression. In addition, recent explorations of the genetic variations that predispose to certain types of sickle cell disease-related tissue injury, such as stroke or nephropathy, are expected to lead to identification of drugs targeting the pathways uncovered by such work. Thus, the next five to ten years holds a promise of new treatments for sickle cell disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.