Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484462›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2017

Uterine Natural Killer Cells: Functional Distinctions and Influence on Pregnancy in Humans and Mice.

Louise M Gaynor, Francesco Colucci

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Transcriptomic Analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Enhanced CD56 Expression and Increased Number of CD56American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Louise M GaynorCentre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Francesco ColucciCentre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/12/4/29254Wellcome Trust 200841/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of development and function of natural killer (NK) cells has progressed significantly in recent years. However, exactly how uterine NK (uNK) cells develop and function is still unclear. To help investigators that are beginning to study tissue NK cells, we summarize in this review our current knowledge of the development and function of uNK cells, and what is yet to be elucidated. We compare and contrast the biology of human and mouse uNK cells in the broader context of the biology of innate lymphoid cells and with reference to peripheral NK cells. We also review how uNK cells may regulate trophoblast invasion and uterine spiral arterial remodeling in human and murine pregnancy.

Indexed as

arterial remodelingplacentapregnancytrophoblastuterine innate lymphoid cellsuterine natural killer cells

Identifiers

PMID28484462
PMCPMC5402472
OpenAlexW2608055428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.