Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484389›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2017

Outpatient Tinnitus Clinic, Self-Help Web Platform, or Mobile Application to Recruit Tinnitus Study Samples?

Thomas Probst, Rüdiger C Pryss, Berthold Langguth, Myra Spiliopoulou, Michael Landgrebe, Markku Vesala, Stephen Harrison, Johannes Schobel, Manfred Reichert, Michael Stach and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Retrospective Analysis of Internet-Based Sharing Nursing Service Appointment Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thomas ProbstGeorg-Elias-Müller Institute for Psychology, Georg-August University GöttingenGöttingen, Germany.
Rüdiger C PryssInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany.
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Regensburg at Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, University of RegensburgRegensburg, Germany.
Myra SpiliopoulouDepartment of Technical and Business Information Systems, Otto-von-Guericke-University MagdeburgMagdeburg, Germany.
Michael LandgrebeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Regensburg at Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, University of RegensburgRegensburg, Germany.
Markku VesalaTinnitus Hub LtdHemsworth, UK.
Stephen HarrisonTinnitus Hub LtdHemsworth, UK.
Johannes SchobelInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany.
Manfred ReichertInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany.
Michael StachInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm UniversityUlm, Germany.
Winfried SchleeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University of Regensburg at Bezirksklinikum Regensburg, University of RegensburgRegensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For understanding the heterogeneity of tinnitus, large samples are required. However, investigations on how samples recruited by different methods differ from each other are lacking. In the present study, three large samples each recruited by different means were compared:

Indexed as

clinical datacrowdsensingcrowdsourcingrecruitmenttinnitus

Identifiers

PMID28484389
PMCPMC5399071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.