Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484312›Full record

ReviewActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2016

Genetic diagnosis as a tool for personalized treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Luca Bello, Elena Pegoraro

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterizing health state utilities associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive Molecular Analysis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Precision Medicine in Rare Diseases.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Genetic modifiers of respiratory function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A pattern-based approach to the interpretation of skeletal muscle biopsies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Muscular Dystrophy: A Retrospective Evaluation of 15 Cases.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca BelloDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Italy.
Elena PegoraroDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate definition of genetic mutations causing Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) has always been relevant in order to provide genetic counseling to patients and families, and helps to establish the prognosis in the case where the distinction between Duchenne, Becker, or intermediate muscular dystrophy is not obvious. As molecular treatments aimed at dystrophin restoration in DMD are increasingly available as commercialized drugs or within clinical trials, genetic diagnosis has become an indispensable tool in order to determine eligibility for these treatments. DMD patients in which multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or similar techniques show a deletion suitable to exon skipping of exons 44, 45, 51, or 53, may be currently treated with AONs targeting these exons, in the context of clinical trials, or, as is the case for exon 51 skipping in the United States, with the first commercialized drug (eteplirsen). Patients who test negative at MLPA, but in whom

Indexed as

Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneGenetic TestingGenetic TherapyHumansPhenotypePrecision MedicineCRISPR-Cas9Duchenne muscular dystrophyexon skippinggenetic diagnosisstop codon readthrough

Identifiers

PMID28484312
PMCPMC5416739
OpenAlexW2611174190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.