Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484307›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2016

Understanding Acoustic Cavitation Initiation by Porous Nanoparticles: Toward Nanoscale Agents for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy.

Adem Yildirim, Rajarshi Chattaraj, Nicholas T Blum, Andrew P Goodwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanostructured TiOUltrasonics sonochemistry · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ultrasound-Activated Nanomaterials for Therapeutics.Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adem YildirimDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder. Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States.
Rajarshi ChattarajDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder. Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Nicholas T BlumDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder. Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States.
Andrew P GoodwinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder. Boulder, Colorado 80303, United States.

Funding

Rapid, Multiscale Sensing Using Acoustic Detection MechanismsDP2EB020401 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI GOODWIN, ANDREW P · 2014 to 2017
$2.3M
Enzyme-Responsive Nanoemulsions as Tumor-Specific Ultrasound Contrast Agents R00CA153935 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI GOODWIN, ANDREW P · 2012 to 2014
$705k
Targeted Microbubbles for Noninvasive Measurement of Tumor VEGF LevelsR21EB018034 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BORDEN, MARK ANDREW, GOODWIN, ANDREW P · 2014 to 2015
$407k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA153935NIBIB NIH HHS DP2 EB020401NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB018034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is widely applied in medical diagnosis and therapy due to its safety, high penetration depth, and low cost. In order to improve the contrast of sonographs and efficiency of the ultrasound therapy, echogenic gas bodies or droplets (with diameters from 200 nm to 10 µm) are often used, which are not very stable in the bloodstream and unable to penetrate into target tissues. Recently, it was demonstrated that nanobubbles stabilized by nanoparticles can nucleate ultrasound responsive microbubbles under reduced acoustic pressures, which is very promising for the development of nanoscale (<100 nm) ultrasound agents. However, there is still very little understanding about the effects of nanoparticle properties on the stabilization of nanobubbles and nucleation of acoustic cavitation by these nanobubbles. Here, a series of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with sizes around 100 nm but with different morphologies were synthesized to understand the effects of nanoparticle porosity, surface roughness, hydrophobicity, and hydrophilic surface modification on acoustic cavitation inception by porous nanoparticles. The chemical analyses of the nanoparticles showed that, while the nanoparticles were prepared using the same silica precursor (TEOS) and surfactant (CTAB), they revealed varying amounts of carbon impurities, hydroxyl content, and degrees of silica crosslinking. Carbon impurities or hydrophobic modification with methyl groups is found to be essential for nanobubble stabilization by mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The acoustic cavitation experiments in the presence of ethanol and/or bovine serum albumin (BSA) demonstrated that acoustic cavitation is predominantly nucleated by the nanobubbles stabilized at the nanoparticle surface not inside the mesopores. Finally, acoustic cavitation experiments with rough and smooth nanoparticles were suggested that a rough nanoparticle surface is needed to largely preserve surface nanobubbles after coating the surface with hydrophilic macromolecules, which is required for in vivo applications of nanoparticles.

Identifiers

PMID28484307
PMCPMC5419691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.