Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484304›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism treatment quarterly2016

Important Activities Among Justice-Involved Individuals with Substance Use Disorders in Posttreatment Aftercare Settings.

Yvita Bustos, Ronald Harvey, Leonard A Jason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism treatment quarterly, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yvita BustosDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ronald HarveyDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Leonard A JasonDepartment of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Evaluating Alternative Aftercare Models for Ex-OffendersR01DA019935 · NIDA · DE PAUL UNIVERSITY · PI JASON, LEONARD A · 2007 to 2011
$3.2M
ABSTINENT SOCIAL SUPPORT IN OXFORD HOUSER01DA013231 · NIDA · DE PAUL UNIVERSITY · PI JASON, LEONARD A · 2000 to 2005
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013231NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA019935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study gathered data using the Important Persons and Activities instrument to record changes in popular activities over a 2-year study of 270 justice-involved individuals randomized into three aftercare conditions: self-run Oxford Houses, a staffed therapeutic community (TC), or usual aftercare (UA). Participants listed important activities during the 2-year study at baseline and at four subsequent 6-month intervals. Categorization of these activities and a descriptive analysis were conducted for Wave 1 (baseline), at Wave 3 (Year 1), and Wave 5 (Year 2). Standardized scores were computed to test differences in proportions of the #1 most favored activity across conditions. Descriptive results also demonstrated that Reading/Writing activities, and Exercise/Sports activities, were most reported at baseline. By Wave 5, Education/Work and Interacting with Others were the most reported activities. These findings indicated that solitary activities, such as Reading/Writing, may play a predominant role in early aftercare whereas Work/Education and social activities increase later on. Implications for future research of changing activities during recovery trajectories are discussed.

Indexed as

aftercareImportant People and Activities Inventoryjustice-involvedOxford Houserecovery capitalsubstance use disorders

Identifiers

PMID28484304
PMCPMC5419682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.