Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28484013›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies.

Jonas R Kunst, Ronald Fischer, Jim Sidanius, Lotte Thomsen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonas R KunstDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway; j.r.kunst@psykologi.uio.no.
Ronald FischerSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn, Wellington 6012, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3055-3955
Jim SidaniusDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Lotte ThomsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether and how societal structures shape individual psychology is a foundational question of the social sciences. Combining insights from evolutionary biology, economy, and the political and psychological sciences, we identify a central psychological process that functions to sustain group-based hierarchies in human societies. In study 1, we demonstrate that macrolevel structural inequality, impaired population outcomes, socio-political instability, and the risk of violence are reflected in the endorsement of group hegemony at the aggregate population level across 27 countries (

Indexed as

PrejudiceSocial DominanceHumansInternationalityViolenceethnic persecutionmulti-level mediationracismsocial dominancesocial inequality

Identifiers

PMID28484013
PMCPMC5448166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.