Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28483979›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Chronic and Acute Stress Promote Overexploitation in Serial Decision Making.

Jennifer K Lenow, Sara M Constantino, Nathaniel D Daw, Elizabeth A Phelps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  3. Disentangling the roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during human decision-making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  4. Updating Beliefs under Perceived Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Computational Mechanisms of Information-Seeking in Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Latent-state and model-based learning in PTSD.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Childhood unpredictability and the development of exploration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer K LenowDepartment of Psychology and.
Sara M ConstantinoDepartment of Psychology and.
Nathaniel D DawPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, and.ORCID 0000-0001-5029-1430
Elizabeth A PhelpsDepartment of Psychology and liz.phelps@nyu.edu.

Funding

Emotions and Choice: Mechanisms of Behavior ChangeR01AG039283 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PHELPS, ELIZABETH ANYA · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many decisions that humans make resemble foraging problems in which a currently available, known option must be weighed against an unknown alternative option. In such foraging decisions, the quality of the overall environment can be used as a proxy for estimating the value of future unknown options against which current prospects are compared. We hypothesized that such foraging-like decisions would be characteristically sensitive to stress, a physiological response that tracks biologically relevant changes in environmental context. Specifically, we hypothesized that stress would lead to more exploitative foraging behavior. To test this, we investigated how acute and chronic stress, as measured by changes in cortisol in response to an acute stress manipulation and subjective scores on a questionnaire assessing recent chronic stress, relate to performance in a virtual sequential foraging task. We found that both types of stress bias human decision makers toward overexploiting current options relative to an optimal policy. These findings suggest a possible computational role of stress in decision making in which stress biases judgments of environmental quality.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFeeding BehaviorRewardUncertaintyAdultFemaleHumansMaleStress, Psychologicaldecision makingforagingstress

Identifiers

PMID28483979
PMCPMC5469305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.