Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28483887›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2017

Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits.

Rhea E Powell, Jeffrey M Henstenburg, Grace Cooper, Judd E Hollander, Kristin L Rising

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04683744 (Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 222 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
222citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
25.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04683744 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening: Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementation

TypeobservationalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled82ConditionsColorectal Cancer ScreeningArmsSemi-structured interviews-Patients, Semi-structured interviews-Health system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

222 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 479 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

162 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhea E PowellDepartment of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey M HenstenburgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Grace CooperDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Judd E HollanderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kristin L RisingDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Kristin.rising@jefferson.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTelehealth is a care delivery model that promises to increase the flexibility and reach of health services. Our objective is to describe patient experiences with video visits performed with their established primary care clinicians.

methodsWe constructed semistructured, in-depth qualitative interviews with adult patients following video visits with their primary care clinicians at a single academic medical center. Data were analyzed with a content analysis approach.

resultsOf 32 eligible patients, 19 were successfully interviewed. All patients reported overall satisfaction with video visits, with the majority interested in continuing to use video visits as an alternative to in-person visits. The primary benefits cited were convenience and decreased costs. Some patients felt more comfortable with video visits than office visits and expressed a preference for receiving future serious news via video visit, because they could be in their own supportive environment. Primary concerns with video visits were privacy, including the potential for work colleagues to overhear conversations, and questions about the ability of the clinician to perform an adequate physical examination.

conclusionsPrimary care video visits are acceptable in a variety of situations. Patients identified convenience, efficiency, communication, privacy, and comfort as domains that are potentially important to consider when assessing video visits vs in-person encounters. Future studies should explore which patients and conditions are best suited for video visits.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overConfidentialityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTelemedicineYoung Adultpatient satisfactionprimary health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID28483887
PMCPMC5422083
OpenAlexW2411813461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.