Public Reporting II: State of the Art-Current Public Reporting in Cardiovascular Medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Readability of Patient-Facing Information in Public Reporting System: Cross-Sectional Evaluation of the City of Helsinki Website.Online journal of public health informatics · 2026
   Article
2. Public Reporting of Quality and Clinical Outcomes in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry.JAMA network open · 2026
   Article
3. Hospital Characteristics and Early Enrollment Trends in the American College of Cardiology Voluntary Public Reporting Program.JAMA network open · 2022
   Article
4. Development of Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality and Readmission Models for Public Reporting on Hospital Performance in Canada.CJC open · 2021
   Article
5. The Role of National Registries in Improving Quality of Care and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as