Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28483823›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Patient use of blood pressure self-screening facilities in general practice waiting rooms: a qualitative study in the UK.

Alice C Tompson, Sabrina Grant, Sheila M Greenfield, Richard J McManus, Susannah Fleming, Carl J Heneghan, Fd Richard Hobbs, Alison M Ward

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Patient experience of home and waiting room blood pressure measurement: a qualitative study of patients with recently diagnosed hypertension.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  7. Patient use of blood pressure self-screening facilities in general practice waiting rooms.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  8. Patient use of blood pressure self-screening in general practice waiting rooms: authors' response.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alice C TompsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Sabrina GrantSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Sheila M GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Services Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Susannah FlemingNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Carl J HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Fd Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Alison M WardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health IS-SPC-0514-10043Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Department of Health RP-PG-1209-10051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood pressure (BP) self-screening, whereby members of the public have access to BP monitoring equipment outside of healthcare consultations, may increase the detection and treatment of hypertension. Currently in the UK such opportunities are largely confined to GP waiting rooms.

aimTo investigate the reasons why people do or do not use BP self-screening facilities. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional, qualitative study in Oxfordshire, UK.

methodSemi-structured interviews with members of the general public recruited using posters in GP surgeries and community locations were recorded, transcribed, and coded thematically.

resultsOf the 30 interviewees, 20% were hypertensive and almost half had self-screened. Those with no history of elevated readings had limited concern over their BP: self-screening filled the time waiting for their appointment or was done to help their doctor. Patients with hypertension self-screened to avoid the feelings they associated with 'white coat syndrome' and to introduce more control into the measurement process. Barriers to self-screening included a lack of awareness, uncertainty about technique, and worries over measuring BP in a public place. An unanticipated finding was that several interviewees preferred monitoring their BP in the waiting room than at home.

conclusionBP self-screening appeared acceptable to service users. Further promotion and education could increase awareness among non-users of the need for BP screening, the existence of self-screening facilities, and its ease of use. Waiting room monitors could provide an alternative for patients with hypertension who are unwilling or unable to monitor at home.

Indexed as

General PracticeAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansHypertensionInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePatient Preferencehypertensionprimary health carequalitative researchscreeningself-careself-monitoring

Identifiers

PMID28483823
PMCPMC5565859
OpenAlexW2612993451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.