Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28483822›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Influences on GP coping and resilience: a qualitative study in primary care.

Anna Cheshire, Damien Ridge, John Hughes, David Peters, Maria Panagioti, Chantal Simon, George Lewith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The professional resilience of mid-career GPs in the UK: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna CheshireUniversity of Westminster, Department of Psychology, London.
Damien RidgeUniversity of Westminster, Department of Psychology, London.
John HughesRoyal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine UCLH NHS Trust, London.
David PetersUniversity of Westminster Polyclinic and Centre for Resilience, University of Westminster, London.
Maria PanagiotiInstitute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care, Manchester.
Chantal SimonThe Banks and Bearwood Medical Centres, Bournemouth; and medical director for professional development, Royal College of General Practitioners, London.
George LewithPrimary Care, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton; and visiting professor, University of Westminster Centre for Resilience, London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Neoliberal' work policies, austerity, NHS restructuring, and increased GP consultation rates provide the backdrop against increasing reports of GP burnout and an impending shortage of GPs.

aimTo explore GPs' experiences of workplace challenges and stresses, and their coping strategies, particularly focusing on understanding the impact of recent NHS workplace change. DESIGN AND

settingStudy design was qualitative, with data collected from two focus groups and seven one-to-one telephone interviews.

methodFocus groups and one-to-one telephone interviews explored the experiences of GPs currently practising in England, recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview approach and analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThere were 22 GP participants recruited: focus groups (

conclusionGPs experience their emotional lives and stresses as being meaningfully shaped by NHS factors. To support GPs to provide effective care, resilience building should move beyond the individual to include systemic work issues.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalPrimary Health CareState MedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PractitionersHealth Care ReformHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthQualitative ResearchResilience, Psychologicalcoping skillsgeneral practitionerspolitical factorsprimary health careprofessional burnoutpsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID28483822
PMCPMC5442958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.