Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28483815›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2017

Takashi Yamada, Eri Tahara, Mai Kanke, Keiko Kuwata, Tomoko Nishiyama

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Localization of PP2A-B56 to centromeres in Drosophila.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi YamadaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Japan.
Eri TaharaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Japan.
Mai KankeDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Japan.
Keiko KuwataInstitute of Transformative Bio-Molecules, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoko NishiyamaDivision of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Furo-cho Chikusa-ku Nagoya, Japan nishiyama@bio.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-8349-6536
Nagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sister chromatid cohesion is crucial to ensure chromosome bi-orientation and equal chromosome segregation. Cohesin removal via mitotic kinases and Wapl has to be prevented in pericentromeric regions in order to protect cohesion until metaphase, but the mechanisms of mitotic cohesion protection remain elusive in

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsCell LineChromobox Protein Homolog 5Chromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHumansPhosphoprotein PhosphatasesChromobox Protein Homolog 5Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histonedmt protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsPhosphoprotein Phosphatasescohesion protectionDalmatianshugoshinsister chromatid cohesionsororin

Identifiers

PMID28483815
PMCPMC5452020
OpenAlexW2612359465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.