ReviewBMC pediatrics2017
Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects.
Review in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
131 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Experiences and perspectives of children and adolescents participating in pediatric clinical trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Suicide and Suicidal Ideation Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Decision-Making at End-of-Life for Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Bioethical Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Trajectories of adherence to an obesogenic dietary pattern and changes in diet quality, food intake, and adiposity during adolescence.Nutrition journal · 2025Trial
- Pediatric Advance Care Planning and Adolescent Preparedness and Quality of Life: An RCT.Pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Transition Readiness for Talking With Providers in Urban Youth With Asthma: Associations With Medication Management.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019Trial
- Evaluation of an Interactive, Educational Website Developed for Adolescents to Learn About Pediatric Clinical Trials: DigiKnowIt News.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersTrial
- Legislative differences regarding coercive measures in mental health care for children and adolescents across European countries.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Support for Disclosure of Hereditary Tumor Risk to Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- Developing a prospective ethical governance framework for a discrete choice experiment involving children aged 6-12 years: the PREF-ANX Kids study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- From genes to environment: A life-course approach to prevent pediatric autoimmune diseases.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Perspectives of paediatricians on collecting children's and caregivers' preferences for outcomes relevant to patients: a qualitative interview study in China.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Decisional Conflict Among Adolescents and Young Adults Before and After Facilitated Decision-Making About Learning Personal Genomic Information.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026Article
- Legislative differences in compulsory mental health care for children and adolescents across European countries.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Children's perspectives on preventive youth health services: a focus group study among Dutch children.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Adolescents' Experiences With Sequencing for Genetic Predisposition in Pediatric Cancer: A Quantitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Criteria for unmet need in paediatric populations and their families: a literature-based case study in haematological malignancies in upper-middle and high-income countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Shared decision making in eating disorders: the patient and clinician perspectives.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Screening for red flags and modifying manual therapy techniques for pediatric patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- The living will system in mainland China: legislative status quo, dilemmas and prospects.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious international laws and guidelines stress the importance of respecting the developing autonomy of children and involving minors in decision-making regarding treatment and research participation. However, no universal agreement exists as to at what age minors should be deemed decision-making competent. Minors of the same age may show different levels of maturity. In addition, patients deemed rational conversation-partners as a child can suddenly become noncompliant as an adolescent. Age, context and development all play a role in decision-making competence. In this article we adopt a perspective on competence that specifically focuses on the impact of brain development on the child's decision-making process. MAIN BODY: We believe that the discussion on decision-making competence of minors can greatly benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We adopted such an approach in order to contribute to the understanding on how to deal with children in decision-making situations. Evidence emerging from neuroscience research concerning the developing brain structures in minors is combined with insights from various other fields, such as psychology, decision-making science and ethics. Four capacities have been described that are required for (medical) decision-making: (1) communicating a choice; (2) understanding; (3) reasoning; and (4) appreciation. Each capacity is related to a number of specific skills and abilities that need to be sufficiently developed to support the capacity. Based on this approach it can be concluded that at the age of 12 children can have the capacity to be decision-making competent. However, this age coincides with the onset of adolescence. Early development of the brain's reward system combined with late development of the control system diminishes decision-making competence in adolescents in specific contexts. We conclude that even adolescents possessing capacities required for decision-making, may need support of facilitating environmental factors.
conclusionThis paper intends to offer insight in neuroscientific mechanisms underlying the medical decision-making capacities in minors and to stimulate practices for optimal involvement of minors. Developing minors become increasingly capable of decision-making, but the neurobiological development in adolescence affects competence in specific contexts. Adequate support should be offered in order to create a context in which minors can make competently make decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.