Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28482829›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2017

The PULSAR Specialist Care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized control trial of a training intervention for community mental health teams in recovery-oriented practice.

Frances Shawyer, Joanne C Enticott, Lisa Brophy, Annie Bruxner, Ellie Fossey, Brett Inder, John Julian, Ritsuko Kakuma, Penelope Weller, Elisabeth Wilson-Evered and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Frances ShawyerSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia. frances.shawyer@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2496-7094
Joanne C EnticottSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.
Lisa BrophyMind Australia, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Annie BruxnerSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.
Ellie FosseyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
Brett InderDepartment of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
John JulianSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.
Ritsuko KakumaMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Penelope WellerGraduate School of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Elisabeth Wilson-EveredCollege of Business, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Vrinda EdanSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.
Mike SladeInstitute of Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Graham N MeadowsSouthern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecovery features strongly in Australian mental health policy; however, evidence is limited for the efficacy of recovery-oriented practice at the service level. This paper describes the Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery (PULSAR) Specialist Care trial protocol for a recovery-oriented practice training intervention delivered to specialist mental health services staff. The primary aim is to evaluate whether adult consumers accessing services where staff have received the intervention report superior recovery outcomes compared to adult consumers accessing services where staff have not yet received the intervention. A qualitative sub-study aims to examine staff and consumer views on implementing recovery-oriented practice. A process evaluation sub-study aims to articulate important explanatory variables affecting the interventions rollout and outcomes.

methodsThe mixed methods design incorporates a two-step stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) examining cross-sectional data from three phases, and nested qualitative and process evaluation sub-studies. Participating specialist mental health care services in Melbourne, Victoria are divided into 14 clusters with half randomly allocated to receive the staff training in year one and half in year two. Research participants are consumers aged 18-75 years who attended the cluster within a previous three-month period either at baseline, 12 (step 1) or 24 months (step 2). In the two nested sub-studies, participation extends to cluster staff. The primary outcome is the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery collected from 756 consumers (252 each at baseline, step 1, step 2). Secondary and other outcomes measuring well-being, service satisfaction and health economic impact are collected from a subset of 252 consumers (63 at baseline; 126 at step 1; 63 at step 2) via interviews. Interview-based longitudinal data are also collected 12 months apart from 88 consumers with a psychotic disorder diagnosis (44 at baseline, step 1; 44 at step 1, step 2). cRCT data will be analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects modelling to account for clustering and some repeated measures, supplemented by thematic analysis of qualitative interview data. The process evaluation will draw on qualitative, quantitative and documentary data. DISCUSSION: Findings will provide an evidence-base for the continued transformation of Australian mental health service frameworks toward recovery.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12614000957695 . Date registered: 8 September 2014.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesInservice TrainingOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care TeamAdolescentAdultAgedCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaCo-designComplex InterventionCo-productionMental HealthPsychiatryRandomized Controlled Trial (RCT)RecoveryRecovery-oriented PracticeSpecialist Mental Health ServicesTraining

Identifiers

PMID28482829
PMCPMC5423029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.