ArticleBMC public health2017
Health beliefs, illness perceptions and determinants of breast screening uptake in Malta: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors influencing breast cancer screening practices among women worldwide: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies.BMC women's health · 2024Pooled it
- Predicting factors for breast cancer screening in Middle Eastern women based on health belief model: a systematic review.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022Pooled it
- Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.Psycho-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Exploring barriers to women's participation in breast and cervical cancer screening programs: insights from national health surveys in Türkiye.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Self-Examination and Screening Barriers Associated With Breast Cancer Stages Among Patient Women in Baghdad, Iraq.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026Article
- Exploring Theoretical Models and Frameworks Used to Explain Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Screening Participation: A Scoping Review.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Factors influencing Chinese young adults' intention to receive HPV vaccination: the mediating role of attitude.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Review
- Risk perception regarding social determinants of health among women with breast cancer in Iran: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Perceived barriers and factors influencing uptake of breast cancer screening among women: a population-based cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Screening Mammogram Uptake among Women Attending an Urban University Primary Care Clinic in Malaysia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Public perceptions of myocardial infarction: Do illness perceptions predict preferences for health check results.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Illness Perceptions of COVID-19 in Europe: Predictors, Impacts and Temporal Evolution.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Cervical cancer and screening: knowledge, awareness and attitudes of women in Malta.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Breast Cancer Risk Perception and Mammography Screening Behavior of Women in Northeast Brazil.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Mammography uptake among the female staff of King Saud University.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Validity and Reliability of Health Belief Model Questionnaire for Promoting Breast Self-examination and Screening Mammogram for Early Cancer Detection.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Glucose screening within six months postpartum among Chinese mothers with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen's beliefs and representations of breast cancer (BC) and breast screening (BS) are salient predictors for BS practices. This study utilized the health belief model (HBM) and common-sense model (CSM) of illness self-regulation to explore factors associated with BS uptake in Malta and subsequently, to identify the most important predictors to first screening uptake.
methodsThis cross-sectional survey enrolled Maltese women (n = 404) ages 50 to 60 at the time of their first screening invitation, invited to the National Breast Screening Programme by stratified random sampling, with no personal history of BC. Participants responded to a 121-item questionnaire by telephone between June-September 2015. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests and logistic regression.
resultsThere is high awareness of BC signs and symptoms among Maltese women (>80% agreement for 7 out of 8 signs), but wide variation about causation (e.g., germ or virus: 38.6% 'agree', 30.7% 'disagree'). 'Fear' was the key reason for non-attendance to first invitation (41%, n = 66) and was statistically significant across all subscale items (p < 0.05). Most items within HBM constructs (perceived barriers; cues to action; self-efficacy) were significantly associated with first invitation to the National Breast Screening Programme, such as fear of result (χ2 = 12.0, p = 0.017) and life problems were considered greater than getting mammography (χ2 = 38.8, p = 0.000). Items within CSM constructs of Illness Representation (BC causes; cyclical cancer timeline; consequences) were also significantly associated, such as BC was considered to be life-changing (χ2 = 18.0, p = 0.000) with serious financial consequences (χ2 = 13.3, p = 0.004). There were no significant associations for socio-demographic or health status variables with uptake, except for family income (χ2 = 9.7, p = 0.047). Logistic regression analyses showed that HBM constructs, in particular perceived barriers, were the strongest predictors of non-attendance to first invitation throughout the analyses (p < 0.05). However, the inclusion of illness representation dimensions improved the model accuracy to predict non-attendance when compared to HBM alone (65% vs 38.8%).
conclusionsInterventions should be based on theory including HBM and CSM constructs, and should target first BS uptake and specific barriers to reduce disparities and increase BS uptake in Malta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.