Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28482202›Full record

Trial reportGait & posture2017

Interlimb transfer of motor skill learning during walking: No evidence for asymmetric transfer.

Chandramouli Krishnan, Rajiv Ranganathan, Manik Tetarbe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gait & posture, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  4. Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chandramouli KrishnanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mouli@umich.edu.
Rajiv RanganathanDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Manik TetarbeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

NRI: Wearable eMbots to Induce Recovery of FunctionR01EB019834 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DURFEE, WILLIAM K, GILLESPIE, RICHARD BRENT · 2014 to 2016
$854k
Functional Reorganization of Finger Movements to Improve Hand DexterityR03HD069806 · NICHD · REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO D/B/A SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB · PI RANGANATHAN, RAJIV · 2012 to 2013
$147k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019834NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD069806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have shown that learning a motor skill in one limb can transfer to the opposite limb-a phenomenon called as interlimb transfer. The transfer of motor skills between limbs, however, has shown to be asymmetric, where one side benefits to a greater extent than the other. While this phenomenon has been well-documented in the upper-extremity, evidence for interlimb transfer in the lower-extremity is limited and mixed. This study investigated the extent of interlimb transfer during walking, and tested whether this transfer was asymmetric using a foot trajectory-tracking paradigm that has been specifically used for gait rehabilitation. The paradigm involved learning a new gait pattern which required greater hip and knee flexion during the swing phase of the gait while walking on a treadmill. Twenty young adults were randomized into two equal groups, where one group (right-to-left: RL) practiced the task initially with the dominant right leg and the other group (left-to-right: LR) practiced the task initially with their non-dominant left leg. After training, both groups practiced the task with their opposite leg to test the transfer effects. The changes in tracking error on each leg were computed to quantify learning and transfer effects. The results indicated that practice with one leg improved the motor performance of the other leg; however, the amount of transfer was similar across groups, indicating that there was no asymmetry in transfer. This finding is contradictory to most upper-extremity studies (where asymmetric transfer has been reported) and points out that both differences in neural processes and types of tasks may mediate interlimb transfer.

Indexed as

AdultGaitHealthy VolunteersHumansLower ExtremityMotor SkillsTransfer, PsychologyWalkingYoung AdultAsymmetryCross educationCross-transferMotor taskRehabilitationSkill learning

Identifiers

PMID28482202
PMCPMC5499689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.