Trial reportGait & posture2017
Interlimb transfer of motor skill learning during walking: No evidence for asymmetric transfer.
Trial report in Gait & posture, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commonality of neuronal coherence for motor skill acquisition and interlimb transfer.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A VR-based experimental system for studying mirror visual feedback effects on cross-education.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rest the brain to learn new gait patterns after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Rest the Brain to Learn New Gait Patterns after Stroke.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Reliability and minimal detectable change of stiffness and other mechanical properties of the ankle joint in standing and walking.Gait & posture · 2024Article
- How Does Ankle Mechanical Stiffness Change as a Function of Muscle Activation in Standing and During the Late Stance of Walking?IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Functional Resistance Training to Improve Knee Strength and Function After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Study.Sports health · 2021Article
- Asymmetric interlateral transfer of motor learning in unipedal dynamic balance.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Challenging balance during sensorimotor adaptation increases generalization.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- Learning new gait patterns is enhanced by specificity of training rather than progression of task difficulty.Journal of biomechanics · 2019Article
- Learning and interlimb transfer of new gait patterns are facilitated by distributed practice across days.Gait & posture · 2019Article
- Learning new gait patterns: Age-related differences in skill acquisition and interlimb transfer.Experimental gerontology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several studies have shown that learning a motor skill in one limb can transfer to the opposite limb-a phenomenon called as interlimb transfer. The transfer of motor skills between limbs, however, has shown to be asymmetric, where one side benefits to a greater extent than the other. While this phenomenon has been well-documented in the upper-extremity, evidence for interlimb transfer in the lower-extremity is limited and mixed. This study investigated the extent of interlimb transfer during walking, and tested whether this transfer was asymmetric using a foot trajectory-tracking paradigm that has been specifically used for gait rehabilitation. The paradigm involved learning a new gait pattern which required greater hip and knee flexion during the swing phase of the gait while walking on a treadmill. Twenty young adults were randomized into two equal groups, where one group (right-to-left: RL) practiced the task initially with the dominant right leg and the other group (left-to-right: LR) practiced the task initially with their non-dominant left leg. After training, both groups practiced the task with their opposite leg to test the transfer effects. The changes in tracking error on each leg were computed to quantify learning and transfer effects. The results indicated that practice with one leg improved the motor performance of the other leg; however, the amount of transfer was similar across groups, indicating that there was no asymmetry in transfer. This finding is contradictory to most upper-extremity studies (where asymmetric transfer has been reported) and points out that both differences in neural processes and types of tasks may mediate interlimb transfer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.