Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28482014›Full record

ReviewHuman molecular genetics2017

Genetic modifiers as relevant biological variables of eye disorders.

Kacie J Meyer, Michael G Anderson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human molecular genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deciphering complexity:Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The genetic landscape of inherited eye disorders in 74 consecutive families from the United Arab Emirates.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Modification of theOphthalmic genetics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kacie J MeyerDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics.
Michael G AndersonDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Stem Cell and Organoid CoreP30EY025580 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI TODD E SCHEETZ · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Genetic dissection of pigment dispersing iris diseaseR01EY017673 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ANDERSON, MICHAEL G · 2008 to 2017
$3.1M
Therapy of Nocturnal Intraocular Pressure Elevation Causing Glaucoma ProgressionI01RX001481 · VA · IOWA CITY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, MICHAEL G · 2015 to 2019
–
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY025580NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017673RRD VA I01 RX001481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From early in the study of mammalian genetics, it was clear that modifiers can have a striking influence on phenotypes. Today, several modifiers have now been studied in enough detail to allow a glimpse of how they function and influence our perspective of disease. With respect to diseases of the eye, some modifiers are an important source of phenotypic variation that can elucidate how genes function in networks to collectively shape ocular anatomy and physiology, thus influencing our understanding of basic biology. Other modifiers represent an opportunity for new therapeutic targets, whose manipulation could be used to mitigate ophthalmic disease. Here, we review progress in the study of genetic modifiers of eye disorders, with examples from mice and humans that together illustrate the ubiquitous nature of genetic modifiers and why they are relevant biological variables in experimental design. Special emphasis is given to ophthalmic modifiers in mice, especially those relevant to selection of genetic background and those that might inadvertently be a source of experimental variability. These modifiers are capable of influencing interpretations of many experiments using targeted genome manipulations such as knockouts or transgenics. Whereas there are fewer examples of modifiers of eye disorders in humans with a molecular identification, there is ample evidence that they exist and should be considered as a relevant biological variable in human genetic studies as well.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEyeEye DiseasesGenes, ModifierHumansMicePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID28482014
PMCPMC5886476
OpenAlexW2612275134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.