ArticlePloS one2017
High stringency evaluation of the inactivation / exclusion efficacy of a MALDI-TOF MS chemical extraction method, with filtration of extract through 0.1 µm filters, on Bacillus anthracis Vollum vegetative cells and spores.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scanning electron microscopy and extended viability testing as a tool to evaluate the safety of MALDI-TOF extracts for risk group 3 spore-forming bacteria.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A previous report indicated that a formic acid chemical extraction method for the preparation of protein extracts for matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification, with filtration of extracts through 0.2 μm regenerated cellulose (RC) filters, would not reliably inactivate or exclude Bacillus anthracis Vollum cells or spores when tested under high stringency conditions. B. anthracis was recovered from 13/36 extracts (3/18 from vegetative cell extracts and 10/18 from bacterial spore extracts). In this paper we report the repetition of this study but with the substitution of the 0.2 μm, regenerated cellulose, filters with 0.1 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filters. Experiments were conducted under the same high stringency post-treatment viability test methods (100% of resulting protein content; 7 days Luria (L)-broth and a further 7 days L-agar plate incubation; or 7 days L-agar plate only incubation). B. anthracis was not recovered from any of 18 replicates generated from high concentrations of vegetative cells (107 to 108 cfu), but a single B. anthracis colony was recovered from one of 18 replicates generated from high concentrations of bacterial spores (108 cfu), using a post-treatment viability culture method of 7 days on L-agar plate only. We discuss our results in the context of other similar studies and also a requirement to develop standardised post-treatment viability test methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.