Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28481931›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

High stringency evaluation of the inactivation / exclusion efficacy of a MALDI-TOF MS chemical extraction method, with filtration of extract through 0.1 µm filters, on Bacillus anthracis Vollum vegetative cells and spores.

Simon A Weller, Jennie Latham

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon A WellerCBR Division, Defence and Science Technology Laboratory, Ministry of Defence, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Jennie LathamCBR Division, Defence and Science Technology Laboratory, Ministry of Defence, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A previous report indicated that a formic acid chemical extraction method for the preparation of protein extracts for matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification, with filtration of extracts through 0.2 μm regenerated cellulose (RC) filters, would not reliably inactivate or exclude Bacillus anthracis Vollum cells or spores when tested under high stringency conditions. B. anthracis was recovered from 13/36 extracts (3/18 from vegetative cell extracts and 10/18 from bacterial spore extracts). In this paper we report the repetition of this study but with the substitution of the 0.2 μm, regenerated cellulose, filters with 0.1 μm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) filters. Experiments were conducted under the same high stringency post-treatment viability test methods (100% of resulting protein content; 7 days Luria (L)-broth and a further 7 days L-agar plate incubation; or 7 days L-agar plate only incubation). B. anthracis was not recovered from any of 18 replicates generated from high concentrations of vegetative cells (107 to 108 cfu), but a single B. anthracis colony was recovered from one of 18 replicates generated from high concentrations of bacterial spores (108 cfu), using a post-treatment viability culture method of 7 days on L-agar plate only. We discuss our results in the context of other similar studies and also a requirement to develop standardised post-treatment viability test methods.

Indexed as

Bacillus anthracisFiltrationFluorocarbon PolymersPolyvinylsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationSpores, BacterialFluorocarbon Polymerspolyvinylidene fluoridePolyvinyls

Identifiers

PMID28481931
PMCPMC5421796
OpenAlexW2612993883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.