ArticleThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
The Third Time's a Charm: Psychometric Testing and Update of the Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test.
Article in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05057364 (Heart Smart), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Heart Smart: A Virtual Self-Management Program for Homebound People With Heart Failure
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of Available Cardiovascular Disease Knowledge Tools: A Systematic Review.Global heart · 2025Pooled it
- Shared heart failure knowledge and self-care outcomes in patient-caregiver dyads.Heart & lung : the journal of critical careTrial
- Psychosocial, Clinical, and Knowledge-Based Factors Associated with Self-Care in Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Patients with Heart Failure Across Three Ejection Fraction Categories: A Two-Center Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Trajectories and influencing factors of self-care behaviors in Chinese older adults with chronic heart failure: A prospective observational study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- A State-of-the-Art Review of Teach-Back for Patients and Families With Heart Failure: How Far Have We Come?The Journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2023Article
- Examining the underlying processes of different dimensions of self-care behavior among persons with heart failure.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Primary care-based integrated disease management for heart failure: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Characterization of Sedentary Behavior in Heart Failure Patients With Arthritis.Cardiology research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSince first being published in 2009, the Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test (AHFKT) has proven a reliable and valid instrument and has been used in multiple studies. Given advances in heart failure (HF) self-care, we proposed to reevaluate the psychometric properties of the AHFKTv2 across these recent studies and update the instrument.
methodsDemographic, clinical, and baseline AHFKTv2 data from 4 intervention studies in persons with HF were combined for this analysis (N = 284). The 30 questions of the AHFKT are focused on 5 HF self-care knowledge domains: pathophysiology, nutrition, behavior, medications, and symptoms. Characteristics of the sample were analyzed using descriptive statistics; validity testing with t tests and Mann-Whitney 2-group tests and Pearson r and Spearman ρ correlations; and reliability calculations and factor analysis were performed based on tetrachoric correlations.
resultsParticipants were 22 to 84 years of age, 66% were African American, 63% were male, and 94% had New York Heart Association class II to III HF. Mean AHFKT score was 80.6% (±11%). Hypotheses that higher levels of knowledge would be associated with higher education level (t = -2.7, P < .01) and less sodium consumption (ρ = -0.22, P = .03) were validated. Factor analysis revealed 1 general knowledge factor with good reliability, Cronbach's α was .87. Item response analysis identified individual questions requiring review and revision.
conclusionComprehensive psychometric evaluation of the AHFKTv2 confirmed its internal consistency reliability and validity and provided direction for production of the AHFKTv3 available for use in research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.