Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28481770›Full record

SynthesisAIDS (London, England)2017

Elective cesarean section for women living with HIV: a systematic review of risks and benefits.

Caitlin E Kennedy, Ping T Yeh, Shristi Pandey, Ana P Betran, Manjulaa Narasimhan

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. ISIDOG Recommendations Concerning COVID-19 and Pregnancy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on HIV prevention and management in pregnancy Number 10 - 2025.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  8. HIV infection during pregnancy in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2021-2023.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. HIV infections and HIV testing during pregnancy, Germany, 1993 to 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin E KennedyaDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA bDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, including the UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Geneva, Switzerland.
Ping T Yeh
Shristi Pandey
Ana P Betran
Manjulaa Narasimhan
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Synthesizing HIV Behavioral Intervention Effectiveness in Developing CountriesR01MH090173 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SWEAT, MICHAEL D · 2010 to 2019
$4.2M
World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND

designTo inform WHO guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes comparing cesarean section (c-section) before labor and rupture of membranes [elective c-section (ECS)] with other modes of delivery for women living with HIV.

methodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, CENTRAL, and previous reviews to identify published trials and observational studies through October 2015. Results were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis, stratifying for combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), CD4/viral load (VL), delivery at term, and low-income/middle-income countries.

resultsFrom 2567 citations identified, 36 articles met inclusion criteria. The single randomized trial, published in 1999, reported minimal maternal morbidity and significantly fewer infant HIV infections with ECS [odds ratio (OR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0-0.5]. Across observational studies, ECS was associated with increased maternal morbidity compared with vaginal delivery (OR 3.12, 95% CI 2.21-4.41). ECS was also associated with decreased infant HIV infection overall (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.63) and in low-income/middle-income countries (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16-0.45), but not among women on cART (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.47-1.43) or with CD4 cell count more than 200/VL less than 400/term delivery (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.21-1.63). Infant morbidity moderately increased with ECS.

conclusionAlthough ECS may reduce infant HIV infection, this effect was not statistically significant in the context of cART and viral suppression. As ECS poses other risks, routine ECS for all women living with HIV may not be appropriate. Risks and benefits will differ across settings, depending on underlying risks of ECS complications and vertical transmission during delivery. Understanding individual client risks and benefits and respecting women's autonomy remain important.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionElective Surgical ProceduresGuideline AdherenceReproductive HealthDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28481770
PMCPMC5491238
OpenAlexW2610177016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.