Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28481342›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2017

Recurrent noncoding regulatory mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Michael E Feigin, Tyler Garvin, Peter Bailey, Nicola Waddell, David K Chang, David R Kelley, Shimin Shuai, Steven Gallinger, John D McPherson, Sean M Grimmond and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The pancreatic cancer genome revisited.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael E FeiginCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Tyler GarvinWatson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
Peter BaileyWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Nicola WaddellQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
David K ChangWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
David R KelleyDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Shimin ShuaiDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9527-8018
Steven GallingerLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John D McPhersonGenome Technologies Program, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sean M GrimmondWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Ekta KhuranaSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-7566
Lincoln D SteinDepartment of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew V BiankinWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-5597
Michael C SchatzCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.
David A TuvesonCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, USA.

Funding

Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
UAB / UMN SPORE in Pancreatic CancerP50CA101955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KLUG, CHRISTOPHER · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
Computational Methods for Genome Assembly, Transcript Assembly, and Variant DiscoveryR01HG006677 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2011 to 2025
$10.7M
COMPUTATIONAL AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO VALIDATING CANCER GENOME TARGETSU01CA168409 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI POWERS, SCOTT · 2012 to 2016
$7.3M
CSHL Watson School of Biological SciencesT32GM065094 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GANN, ALEXANDER · 2002 to 2021
$4.8M
(PQA-4) Organoid Omics To Detect And Defeat Ductal Pancreatic CancerR01CA190092 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI TUVESON, DAVID A · 2014 to 2017
$2.2M
Integrated Translational Cancer Science CenterU10CA180944 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI BAKER, LAURENCE HOWARD, LIU, EDISON TAK-BUN · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Mutant mouse models of exocrine pancreatic cancerR01CA101973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TUVESON, DAVID A · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
Cancer Research UK 17263Cancer Research UK 22533Medical Research Council MR/N005813/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA045508NCI NIH HHS P50 CA101955NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101973NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190092NCI NIH HHS U01 CA168409NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180944NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006677NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contributions of coding mutations to tumorigenesis are relatively well known; however, little is known about somatic alterations in noncoding DNA. Here we describe GECCO (Genomic Enrichment Computational Clustering Operation) to analyze somatic noncoding alterations in 308 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs) and identify commonly mutated regulatory regions. We find recurrent noncoding mutations to be enriched in PDA pathways, including axon guidance and cell adhesion, and newly identified processes, including transcription and homeobox genes. We identified mutations in protein binding sites correlating with differential expression of proximal genes and experimentally validated effects of mutations on expression. We developed an expression modulation score that quantifies the strength of gene regulation imposed by each class of regulatory elements, and found the strongest elements were most frequently mutated, suggesting a selective advantage. Our detailed single-cancer analysis of noncoding alterations identifies regulatory mutations as candidates for diagnostic and prognostic markers, and suggests new mechanisms for tumor evolution.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticMutationAdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsReceptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 8Sodium-Potassium-Chloride SymportersPTPRN2 protein, humanReceptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 8SLC12A8 protein, humanSodium-Potassium-Chloride Symporters

Identifiers

PMID28481342
PMCPMC5659388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.