Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28481247›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Epigenetic Bases of Aberrant Glycosylation in Cancer.

Fabio Dall'Olio, Marco Trinchera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interplay Between Glucose Metabolism and Chromatin Modifications in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Adhesion to aggression: unravelling sLeClinical & experimental metastasis · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The T/Tn-SpecificCancers · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Glycosyltransferases in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Epigenetic Regulation of Glycosylation in Cancer and Other Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Global view of human protein glycosylation pathways and functions.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fabio Dall'OlioDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy. fabio.dallolio@unibo.it.
Marco TrincheraDepartment of Medicine and Surgery (DMC), University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy. marco.trinchera@uninsubria.it.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, the sugar portions of glycoproteins, glycolipids, and glycosaminoglycans constitute the glycome, and the genes involved in their biosynthesis, degradation, transport and recognition are referred to as "glycogenes". The extreme complexity of the glycome requires the regulatory layer to be provided by the epigenetic mechanisms. Almost all types of cancers present glycosylation aberrations, giving rise to phenotypic changes and to the expression of tumor markers. In this review, we discuss how cancer-associated alterations of promoter methylation, histone methylation/acetylation, and miRNAs determine glycomic changes associated with the malignant phenotype. Usually, increased promoter methylation and miRNA expression induce glycogene silencing. However, treatment with demethylating agents sometimes results in silencing, rather than in a reactivation of glycogenes, suggesting the involvement of distant methylation-dependent regulatory elements. From a therapeutic perspective aimed at the normalization of the malignant glycome, it appears that miRNA targeting of cancer-deranged glycogenes can be a more specific and promising approach than the use of drugs, which broad target methylation/acetylation. A very specific type of glycosylation, the addition of GlcNAc to serine or threonine (O-GlcNAc), is not only regulated by epigenetic mechanisms, but is an epigenetic modifier of histones and transcription factors. Thus, glycosylation is both under the control of epigenetic mechanisms and is an integral part of the epigenetic code.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylglucosamineAnimalsGalectinsGlycosylationHistonesHumansNeoplasmsAcetylglucosamineGalectinsHistonesDNA methylationglycomeglycosyltransferasesmiRNA targeting

Identifiers

PMID28481247
PMCPMC5454911
OpenAlexW2610443399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.