Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28481027›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Neural correlates of fine-grained meaning distinctions: An fMRI investigation of scalar quantifiers.

Jiayu Zhan, Xiaoming Jiang, Stephen Politzer-Ahles, Xiaolin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What a picture selection task can tell us about scalar implicature processing? A neuroimaging investigation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayu ZhanSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Xiaoming JiangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Stephen Politzer-AhlesDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5474-7930
Xiaolin ZhouSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7363-4360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication involves successfully deriving a speaker's meaning beyond the literal expression. Using fMRI, it was investigated how the listener's brain realizes distinctions between enrichment-based meanings and literal semantic meanings. The neural patterns of the Mandarin scalar quantifier you-de (similar to some in English) which implies the meanings not all and not most via scalar enrichment, with the specific quantifier shao-shu-de (similar to less than half in English) which lexico-semantically encodes the meanings not all and not most, were compared. Listeners heard sentences using either quantifier, paired with pictures in which either less than half, more than half, or all of the people depicted in the picture were doing the described activity; thus, the conditions included both implicature-based and semantics-based picture-sentence mismatches. Imaging results showed bilateral ventral IFG was activated for both kinds of mismatch, whereas basal ganglia and left dorsal IFG were activated uniquely for implicature-based mismatch. These findings suggest that resolving conflicts involving inferential aspects of meaning employs different neural mechanisms than the processing based on literal semantic meaning, and that the dorsal prefrontal/basal ganglia pathway makes a contribution to implicature-based interpretation. Furthermore, within the implicature-based conditions, different neural generators were implicated in the processing of strong implicature mismatch (you-de in the context of a picture in which "all" would have been true) and weak implicature mismatch (you-de in the context of a picture in which "most" would have been true), which may have important implications for theories of pragmatic comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3848-3864, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainBrain MappingComprehensionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPattern Recognition, VisualSemanticsSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultfMRIpicture-sentence verificationpragmaticsscalar implicaturesemantics

Identifiers

PMID28481027
PMCPMC6867027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.