ArticleJournal of biological rhythms2017
Plasticity in the Period of the Circadian Pacemaker Induced by Phase Dispersion of Its Constituent Cellular Clocks.
Article in Journal of biological rhythms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optogenetic stimulation of VIPergic SCN neurons induces photoperiodic-like changes in the mammalian circadian clock.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Distinct Components of Photoperiodic Light Are Differentially Encoded by the Mammalian Circadian Clock.Journal of biological rhythms · 2020Article
- Mathematical modeling of circadian rhythms.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2019Review
- Quantitative analysis of circadian single cell oscillations in response to temperature.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian circadian pacemaker is commonly thought to be a rigid oscillator that generates output under a variety of circumstances that differ only in phase, period, and/or amplitude. Yet the pacemaker is composed of many cells that each can respond to varying circumstances in different ways. Computer simulations demonstrate that networks of such pacemaker cells behave differently under a light-dark cycle compared with constant darkness. The differences demonstrate that the circadian pacemaker is plastic: The pacemaker shapes its properties in response to the circumstances. A consequence is that properties of a pacemaker under a light-dark cycle cannot be derived from studies of the same system in constant darkness. In this paper we show that the dispersion of phase in a network of coupled oscillators can influence ensemble period: For the considered type of coupling, it is demonstrated that the more synchronous the cells are, the longer is the ensemble period. This is consistent with various data sets obtained in mammals, and even with a data set from fruit flies, in which circadian variation in behavior is regulated in a distinctly differently way from that in mammals. We conclude that environmental circumstances such as photoperiod and exposure to light pulses in otherwise darkness modify the phase distribution of the network and, thereby, the period of the ensemble. Our study supports the view that such properties as circadian period are not solely determined by clock genes but are also determined by the genes that regulate the communication in cellular networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.