Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28480650›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Korean medical science2017

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Balloon Followed by Bare Metal Stent with Drug-Eluting Stent for Treatment of de Novo Lesions: Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Clinical Trial.

In Ho Chae, Chang Hwan Yoon, Jin Joo Park, Il Young Oh, Jung Won Suh, Young Seok Cho, Tae Jin Youn, Dong Ju Choi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Korean medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

In Ho ChaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1644-2105
Chang Hwan YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. kunson2@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-4442
Jin Joo ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9611-1490
Il Young OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5584-605X
Jung Won SuhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0397-6071
Young Seok ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-9868
Tae Jin YounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4628-9503
Dong Ju ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0146-2189
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combined use of a drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and a bare metal stent (BMS) for the treatment of de novo non-small vessel coronary artery diseases (CAD) remains to be evaluated. We investigated the efficacy of a sequential treatment using a DEB together with a BMS implantation in comparison to a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). This study was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. We designed it to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a sequential treatment using a DEB first followed by a BMS (DEB + BMS) compared with the use of a ZES. The primary endpoint was in-segment late loss (LL) at 9 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The 9-month follow-up angiography was performed in 72 patients with DEB + BMS and 74 patients with ZES. When comparing the DEB + BMS results with the ZES ones, LL was 0.50 ± 0.46 mm in DEB + BMS patients vs. 0.21 ± 0.44 mm in ZES patients (P < 0.001). The mean difference of the LL was 0.31 mm, which was larger than the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 0.19 mm, and the 2-sided 95% confidence interval was 0.15-0.48. The clinical outcomes were not significantly different. In conclusion, the DEB + BMS strategy is inferior to the ZES one in terms of the LL result at 9 months. The DEB strategy for de novo coronary artery lesions needs to be improved for it to become an alternative treatment option.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryDrug-Eluting StentsAgedAge FactorsCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes ComplicationsFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMetalsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSirolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsMetalsSirolimuszotarolimusBare Metal StentCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-eluting BalloonDrug-eluting StentIn-segment Late Loss

Identifiers

PMID28480650
PMCPMC5426232
OpenAlexW2610707782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.