Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28480132›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Osteology of

Emanuel Tschopp, Octávio Mateus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PeerJ · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A nearly complete skull of the sauropod dinosaurRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Information in morphological characters.Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  8. Anatomy and systematics of the diplodocoidRoyal Society open science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cranial anatomy ofPeerJ · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emanuel TschoppDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Octávio MateusGeoBioTec, Faculdade de Ciencia e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Museu da Lourinhã · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diplodocids are among the best known sauropod dinosaurs. Numerous specimens of currently 15 accepted species belonging to ten genera have been reported from the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of North and South America, Europe, and Africa. The highest diversity is known from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of the western United States: a recent review recognized 12 valid, named species, and possibly three additional, yet unnamed ones. One of these is herein described in detail and referred to the genus

Indexed as

DinosauriaDiplodocinaeHowe RanchLate JurassicMorrison FormationNew speciesOntogenySauropoda

Identifiers

PMID28480132
PMCPMC5417106
OpenAlexW2610772929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.