Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28480056›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2017

Mapping the evolving definitions of translational research.

Daniel G Fort, Timothy M Herr, Pamela L Shaw, Karen E Gutzman, Justin B Starren

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. When Did the Term "Translational Research" Emerge-and Why?Journal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Designing for impact: Introducing translational design studies.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Embracing complexity: An opportunity for developmental evaluation.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel G FortDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy M HerrDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Pamela L ShawGalter Health Sciences Library, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karen E GutzmanGalter Health Sciences Library, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Justin B StarrenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)TL1TR001423 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCCOLLEY, SUSANNA A · 2015 to 2023
$5.0M
Genomic Medicine at Northwestern: Discovery and ImplementationU01HG008673 · NHGRI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CHISHOLM, REX L, SMITH, MAUREEN E · 2015 to 2019
$4.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001423NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSystematic review and analysis of definitions of translational research. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe final corpus was comprised of 33 papers, each read by at least 2 reviewers. Definitions were mapped to a common set of research processes for presentation and analysis. Influence of papers and definitions was further evaluated using citation analysis and agglomerative clustering.

resultsAll definitions were mapped to common research processes, revealing most common labels for each process. Agglomerative clustering revealed 3 broad families of definitions. Citation analysis showed that the originating paper of each family has been cited ~10 times more than any other member. DISCUSSION: Although there is little agreement between definitions, we were able to identify an emerging consensus 5-phase (T0-T4) definition for translational research. T1 involves processes that bring ideas from basic research through early testing in humans. T2 involves the establishment of effectiveness in humans and clinical guidelines. T3 primarily focuses on implementation and dissemination research while T4 focuses on outcomes and effectiveness in populations. T0 involves research such as genome-wide association studies which wrap back around to basic research.

conclusionWe used systematic review and analysis to identify emerging consensus between definitions of translational research phases.

Indexed as

Biomedical research/trendsClinical trials as topicTerminology as topicTranslational medical researchTranslational medical research/trends

Identifiers

PMID28480056
PMCPMC5408839
OpenAlexW2583363516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.