ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017
Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluating the impact of a CTSA program from 2008 to 2021 through bibliometrics, social network analysis, and altmetrics.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Translational research: from basic research to regional biomedical entrepreneurship.Small business economics · 2023Article
- Using bibliometrics to evaluate outcomes and influence of translational biomedical research centers.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Methods for identifying biomedical translation: a systematic review.American journal of translational research · 2022Review
- A large National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre facilitates impactful cross-disciplinary and collaborative translational research publications and research collaboration networks: a bibliometric evaluation study.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Practical publication metrics for academics.Clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- A Bibliometric Measure of Translational Science.Scientometrics · 2020Article
- Scope, Influence, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Publication Portfolio of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2017.Evaluation & the health professions · 2020Article
- Using bibliometrics to evaluate translational science training: evidence for early career success of KL2 scholars.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Scientometric analysis of the Puerto Rico Clinical and Translational Research Consortium (PRCTRC) research publications, 2010-2018.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Bibliometrics approach to evaluating the research impact of CTSAs: A pilot study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Electronic Cigarette Publications: 2003⁻2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- The relative citation ratio: what is it and why should medical librarians care?Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2018Article
- Charting the Publication and Citation Impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2016.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2018Article
- Article
- Using publication data to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) career development program: Early outcomes from KL2 scholars.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2017Article
- The Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network: a model for clinical trial readiness.Therapeutic advances in rare diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionA pilot study by 6 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs) explored how bibliometrics can be used to assess research influence.
methodsEvaluators from 6 institutions shared data on publications (4202 total) they supported, and conducted a combined analysis with state-of-the-art tools. This paper presents selected results based on the tools from 2 widely used vendors for bibliometrics: Thomson Reuters and Elsevier.
resultsBoth vendors located a high percentage of publications within their proprietary databases (>90%) and provided similar but not equivalent bibliometrics for estimating productivity (number of publications) and influence (citation rates, percentage of papers in the top 10% of citations, observed citations relative to expected citations). A recently available bibliometric from the National Institutes of Health Office of Portfolio Analysis, examined after the initial analysis, showed tremendous potential for use in the CTSA context.
conclusionDespite challenges in making cross-CTSA comparisons, bibliometrics can enhance our understanding of the value of CTSA-supported clinical and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.