Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28479736›Full record

ArticlePharmacognosy magazine2017

Sandeep Karna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacognosy magazine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep KarnaNational Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, Nongsaengmyeong-ro, Iseo-myeon, Wangju-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
National Horticultural Research Institute · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstaglandins (PGs) have short existence

objectiveNinety-eight plant samples were screened for the discovery of potent 15-PGDH inhibitor. Among them, top five plant extracts as potent 15-PGDH inhibitor were chosen to determine PGE

methodThe inhibitory activity for 15-PGDH inhibitors was evaluated using fluorescence spectrophotometer by measuring the formation of NADH at 468 nm following excitation at 340 nm. Cell viability assay and PGE

results15-PGDH inhibitors elevated PGE

conclusionEEAH might apply to treat dermal wounds by elevating PGE SUMMARY: Biological inactivation of 15-PGDH causes elevated level of PGE

Indexed as

15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenasecyclooxygenasePGE2Prostaglandinswound healing

Identifiers

PMID28479736
PMCPMC5407103
OpenAlexW2606105489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.