Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28479624›Full record

ReviewBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

Providing oxygen to children in hospitals: a realist review.

Hamish Graham, Shidan Tosif, Amy Gray, Shamim Qazi, Harry Campbell, David Peel, Barbara McPake, Trevor Duke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hamish GrahamCentre for International Child Health, University Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Shidan TosifCentre for International Child Health, University Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Amy GrayCentre for International Child Health, University Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Shamim QaziDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Harry CampbellUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
David PeelAshdown Consultants, Hartfield, England.
Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Trevor DukeCentre for International Child Health, University Department of Paediatrics, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify and describe interventions to improve oxygen therapy in hospitals in low-resource settings, and to determine the factors that contribute to success and failure in different contexts.

methodsUsing realist review methods, we scanned the literature and contacted experts in the field to identify possible mechanistic theories of how interventions to improve oxygen therapy systems might work. Then we systematically searched online databases for evaluations of improved oxygen systems in hospitals in low- or middle-income countries. We extracted data on the effectiveness, processes and underlying theory of selected projects, and used these data to test the candidate theories and identify the features of successful projects.

findingsWe included 20 improved oxygen therapy projects (45 papers) from 15 countries. These used various approaches to improving oxygen therapy, and reported clinical, quality of care and technical outcomes. Four effectiveness studies demonstrated positive clinical outcomes for childhood pneumonia, with large variation between programmes and hospitals. We identified factors that help or hinder success, and proposed a practical framework depicting the key requirements for hospitals to effectively provide oxygen therapy to children. To improve clinical outcomes, oxygen improvement programmes must achieve good access to oxygen and good use of oxygen, which should be facilitated by a broad quality improvement capacity, by a strong managerial and policy support and multidisciplinary teamwork.

conclusionOur findings can inform practitioners and policy-makers about how to improve oxygen therapy in low-resource settings, and may be relevant for other interventions involving the introduction of health technologies.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitalsHumansOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyPoverty AreasQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareOxygen

Identifiers

PMID28479624
PMCPMC5407252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.