ArticleExperimental hematology2017
Development of an assay for cellular efflux of pharmaceutically active agents and its relevance to understanding drug interactions.
Article in Experimental hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- IARC Group 1 Pharmaceuticals and Associated Cancer Risks: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Romidepsin antagonism with CHOEP.Leukemia · 2023Article
- Beneficial Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions: A Tool to Improve the Bioavailability of Poorly Permeable Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2018Review
- Clarifying busulfan metabolism and drug interactions to support new therapeutic drug monitoring strategies: a comprehensive review.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Drug interactions may dictate the failure or success of a treatment. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are exposed to various types of drugs, and understanding how these drugs interact is of the utmost importance. The pharmacokinetics of busulfan, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, drugs commonly used for HSCT, are known to be affected by a variety of other drugs with differing molecular structures. We hypothesized that these structurally unrelated drugs affect the transport of DNA-alkylating agents. To test this hypothesis, we developed a flow cytometry assay that used 5-carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester, which is cleaved by nonspecific intracellular esterases to 5-carboxyfluorescein (5-CF), a fluorescent ligand for the drug transporter MRP1. A decreased 5-CF efflux in the presence of a test compound suggests competitive inhibition. We demonstrated that chlorambucil, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, ketoconazole, ethacrynic acid, everolimus, and sirolimus strongly inhibited 5-CF efflux in lymphoma and leukemia cell lines. The efflux of these drugs partially depends on the glutathione (GSH) level, and their cytotoxicity is synergistic with inhibited GSH synthesis. This is consistent with the hypothesis that their GSH-conjugated products are ligands of a common cellular drug transporter. Our results may explain clinical observations on the effects of various drugs on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alkylating agents, and the assay may be used to deduce interaction mechanisms of drugs transported by a common system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.