Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28479218›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

The Fit Study: Design and rationale for a cluster randomized trial of school-based BMI screening and reporting.

Kristine A Madsen, Jennifer Linchey, Lorrene Ritchie, Hannah R Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years old.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for preventing obesity in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Weight Measurements in School: Setting and Student Comfort.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Food Insecurity Is Associated with Body Dissatisfaction among Children in California.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine A MadsenUC Berkeley School of Public Health, University Hall, Box 7360, Berkeley, CA 94720-7369, United States. Electronic address: madsenk@berkeley.edu.
Jennifer LincheyUC Berkeley School of Public Health, University Hall, Box 7360, Berkeley, CA 94720-7369, United States. Electronic address: jlinchey@berkeley.edu.
Lorrene RitchieNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1111 Franklin Street #10123, Oakland, CA 94607, United States. Electronic address: lritchie@ucanr.edu.
Hannah R ThompsonUC Berkeley School of Public Health, University Hall, Box 7360, Berkeley, CA 94720-7369, United States. Electronic address: thompsonh@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USBerkeley Public Health Division · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · US

Funding

RCT of BMI screening: Effects on obesity, disparities, and body satisfactionR01HL120666 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MADSEN, KRISTINE A · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the U.S., 25 states conduct body mass index (BMI) screening in schools, just under half of which report results to parents. While some experts recommend the practice, evidence demonstrating its efficacy to reduce obesity is lacking, and concerns about weight-related stigma have been raised. METHODS/

designThe Fit Study is a 3-arm cluster-randomized trial assessing the effectiveness of school-based BMI screening and reporting in reducing pediatric obesity and identifying unintended consequences. Seventy-nine elementary and middle schools across California were randomized to 1 of 3 Arms: 1) BMI screening and reporting; 2) BMI screening only; or 3) no BMI screening or reporting. In Arm 1 schools, students were further randomized to receive reports with BMI results alone or both BMI and fitness test results. Over 3 consecutive years, staff in schools in Arms 1 and 2 will measure students' BMI (grades 3-8) and additional aspects of fitness (grades 5-8), and students in grades 4-8 in all Arms will complete surveys to assess weight-based stigmatization. Change in BMI z-score will be compared between Arm 1 and Arm 2 to determine the impact of BMI reporting on weight status, with sub-analyses stratified by report type (BMI results alone versus BMI plus fitness results) and by race/ethnicity. The potential for BMI reports to lead to weight-based stigma will be assessed by comparing student survey results among the 3 study Arms. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence on both the benefit and potential unintended harms of school-based BMI screening and reporting.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexParentsAdolescentBody WeightCaliforniaCardiorespiratory FitnessChildExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMass ScreeningPediatric ObesityRacial GroupsSchool Health Services

Identifiers

PMID28479218
PMCPMC6010055
OpenAlexW2610970810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.