Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28479177›Full record

ArticleVaccine2017

Immunization in pregnancy clinical research in low- and middle-income countries - Study design, regulatory and safety considerations.

Sonali Kochhar, Jan Bonhoeffer, Christine E Jones, Flor M Muñoz, Angel Honrado, Jorgen Bauwens, Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen, Steven Hirschfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maternal vaccination: a review of current evidence and recommendations.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Group B streptococcal disease in the mother and newborn-A review.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonali KochharGlobal Healthcare Consulting, Delhi, India; Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: sonalikochhar@yahoo.co.in.
Jan BonhoefferBrighton Collaboration Foundation, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Christine E JonesFaculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Flor M MuñozBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Angel HonradoSynapse Research Management Partners, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorgen BauwensBrighton Collaboration Foundation, Basel, Switzerland.
Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter MeulenBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Steven HirschfeldUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunization of pregnant women is a promising public health strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality among both the mothers and their infants. Establishing safety and efficacy of vaccines generally uses a hybrid design between a conventional interventional study and an observational study that requires enrolling thousands of study participants to detect an unknown number of uncommon events. Historically, enrollment of pregnant women in clinical research studies encountered many barriers based on risk aversion, lack of knowledge, and regulatory ambiguity. Conducting research enrolling pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries can have additional factors to address such as limited availability of baseline epidemiologic data on disease burden and maternal and neonatal outcomes during and after pregnancy; challenges in recruiting and retaining pregnant women in research studies, variability in applying and interpreting assessment methods, and variability in locally acceptable and available infrastructure. Some measures to address these challenges include adjustment of study design, tailoring recruitment, consent process, retention strategies, operational and logistical processes, and the use of definitions and data collection methods that will align with efforts globally.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeopleResearch DesignVaccinationBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInformed ConsentPatient SafetyPatient SelectionPregnancyStandard of CareTruth DisclosureVaccinesVaccinesAntenatal careClinical trialsDeveloping countryEthicsImmunizationInfectious diseasesInternational healthLow and middle income countryPregnancyPregnant womenPublic healthRegulatoryResearchSafetyStudy designVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID28479177
PMCPMC5714435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.