Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28479167›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2017

Trajectory of Congestion Metrics by Ejection Fraction in Patients With Acute Heart Failure (from the Heart Failure Network).

Andrew P Ambrosy, Ankeet S Bhatt, Dianne Gallup, Kevin J Anstrom, Javed Butler, Adam D DeVore, G Michael Felker, Marat Fudim, Stephen J Greene, Adrian F Hernandez and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prognostic value of estimated plasma volume in acute heart failure in three cohort studies.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew P AmbrosyDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: andrew.ambrosy@dm.duke.edu.
Ankeet S BhattDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Dianne GallupDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Kevin J AnstromDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Javed ButlerDivision of Cardiology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York.
Adam D DeVoreDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
G Michael FelkerDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Marat FudimDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Stephen J GreeneDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Adrian F HernandezDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Jacob P KellyDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Marc D SamskyDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Robert J MentzDivision of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USStony Brook University Hospital · US

Funding

Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Coordinating CenterU10HL084904 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANSTROM, KEVIN J, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2012 to 2018
$38.0M
Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Regional Clinical Center (U10)U10HL110312 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FELKER, GARY M · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS L30 HL133930NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL084904NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in the clinical course of congestion by underlying ejection fraction (EF) have not been well-characterized in acute heart failure (AHF). A post hoc analysis was performed using pooled data from the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure, Cardiorenal Rescue Study in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure, and Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure trials. All patients were admitted for a primary diagnosis of AHF. Patients were grouped as reduced EF ≤40%, borderline 40% < EF < 50%, or preserved EF ≥50%. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association among measures of congestion and the composite of unscheduled outpatient visits, rehospitalization, or death. Mean age was 68 ± 13 years and 74% were male. Patients with a preserved EF were older, more likely to be female, less likely to have an ischemic etiology of HF, and had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Compared with patients with a reduced EF, preserved EF patients had lower amino-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide levels at baseline (i.e., reduced: 5,998 pg/ml [3,009 to 11,414] vs borderline: 4,420 pg/ml [1,740 to 8,057] vs preserved: 3,272 pg/ml [1,687 to 6,536]) and experienced smaller changes during hospitalization. In general, there were few differences between EF groups in the clinical course of congestion as measured by signs and symptoms of HF, body weight change, and net fluid loss. After adjusting for potential confounders, a greater improvement in global visual analog scale was associated with lower risk of unscheduled outpatient visits, rehospitalization, or death at day 60 (hazard ratio 0.94 per 10 mm increase, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.995). This relation did not differ by EF (p = 0.54). In conclusion, among patients hospitalized for AHF, there were few differences in the in-hospital trajectory or prognostic value of routine markers of congestion by EF.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedCause of DeathDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)

Identifiers

PMID28479167
PMCPMC5471496
OpenAlexW2606935497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.