Observational studyDrugs & aging2017
Antiepileptic Drug Treatment in Community-Dwelling Older Patients with Epilepsy: A Retrospective Observational Study of Old- Versus New-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs.
Observational study in Drugs & aging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive Side Effects of Antiseizure Medications in Adults with Epilepsy: An Update with a Focus on New Therapeutic Agents.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- Alzheimer's disease-associated genotypes differentially influence chronic evoked seizure outcomes and antiseizure medicine efficacy in aged mice.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Analysis of ASMs and male infertility using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions Associated with Old- and New- Generation Antiepileptic Drugs Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.Clinical drug investigation · 2019Article
- Pharmacokinetic Factors to Consider in the Selection of Antiseizure Drugs for Older Patients with Epilepsy.Drugs & aging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in older patients with epilepsy is challenged by polypharmacy and decreased drug elimination. Newer AEDs have a lower potential for drug interactions and are reported to be better tolerated by the elderly than old-generation AEDs.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate AED use and the related adverse event rate in an outpatient cohort of older patients with epilepsy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the computerized database and medical records of all the patients aged ≥60 years who visited our epilepsy outpatient clinic (Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel) during a 4-year period from February 2012 to February 2016. In this study, phenytoin, valproic acid, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, clobazam, and clonazepam were defined as old-generation AEDs. Gabapentin, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, and perampanel were defined as new-generation AEDs.
resultsThe study group included 115 patients aged 60-90 years (mean 70.5 ± 7.8 years), 70 (61%) of whom were men. Co-morbidities were present in 98.3% of the patients, including neuropsychiatric illnesses in 21.2%. Present medical treatment included new-generation AEDs in 49 (44.5%) and both old- and new-generation AEDs in 20 (18.2%) patients. The most commonly used current AEDs were phenytoin, gabapentin, levetiracetam, and lamotrigine. Adverse reactions mainly included fatigue and CNS-related symptoms, and were more frequent among patients treated with new-generation AEDs than in those treated with old-generation AEDs or a combination of old- and new-generation AEDs; however, these reactions were mostly related to levetiracetam treatment. The likelihood of levetiracetam-related adverse events was increased by slow levetiracetam titration [defined as a weekly dose increase of ≤250 mg/day in this study; odds ratio (OR) 16.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.94-90.98], and by low- (OR 5.68, 95% CI 1.40-22.95) and high (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.28-14.02) levetiracetam dosages compared with patients treated with lamotrigine or gabapentin.
conclusionsNew-generation AEDs were administered to most of the patients in this outpatient clinic-based cohort of older patients with epilepsy. In order to decrease levetiracetam-related adverse events in this age group, we suggest that a slower titration rate (e.g., an increase of ≤125 mg/day each week) and lower maximal dosage (e.g., 1500 mg/day) of the drug should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.