Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28478494›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

The impact on cognitive functions of patients with pituitary adenoma before and after surgery.

Xianxiang Wang, Xuanxia Tong, Yanfeng Zou, Xuefeng Tian, Zhongxiang Mao, Zhongwu Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xianxiang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.
Xuanxia TongDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.
Yanfeng ZouDepartment of Statistics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, China.
Xuefeng TianDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.
Zhongxiang MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China.
Zhongwu SunDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, China. zwsun12@163.com.
Anhui Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with pituitary adenoma have often suffered cognitive impairment. The study aims to identify the factors, and their impact, that affect the cognitive functions of pituitary adenoma patients. Seventy-six patients with pituitary adenoma were recruited, together with 76 healthy subjects as control. Patients (34 functioning and 42 non-functioning) were randomly assigned into either microscopic (n = 44) or neural endoscopic (n = 32) group. All surgeries were performed through single-nostril transsphenoidal approach under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. All patients were examined with cognitive assessments (CAMCOG-C and MMSE tests), tumor size, eyesight, and hormone levels before surgery. Three months after surgery, all patients were examined again to check hormone level changes by blood samples, tumor excision status via MRI, and cognitive assessments. Compared with healthy control, total score and multiple cognitive scores of CAMCOG-C and MMSE were significantly lower before surgery. There were no correlations between cognitive functions and tumor size or eyesight. Significant difference in cognitive functions was found between functioning and non-functioning pituitary adenoma patients. Significant increase in cognitive functions occurred after surgery, whereas no difference was detected between the two different surgical treatments. The hormone levels were improved significantly in patients with hormone disorders after surgery. The physical compression from tumor might not play a key role in cognitive impairment. However, hormone disorders could be a major factor to cognitive impairment. The improvement in cognitive functions is attributed to the amelioration of endocrine disorders. There were no differences between two surgical treatments.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAge FactorsCognitionEndoscopyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive functionHormone disorderPituitary adenomaTumor

Identifiers

PMID28478494
OpenAlexW2611400219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.