Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28478354›Full record

ArticlePublic health2017

Social media indicators of the food environment and state health outcomes.

Q C Nguyen, H Meng, D Li, S Kath, M McCullough, D Paul, P Kanokvimankul, T X Nguyen, F Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Space and Place in Alcohol Research.Current epidemiology reports · 2019
    Article
  17. Social determinants of health in mental health care and research: a case for greater inclusion.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Census Tract Food Tweets and Chronic Disease Outcomes in the U.S., 2015⁻2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Q C NguyenDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States. Electronic address: quynh.nguyen@health.utah.edu.
H MengDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.
D LiCenter for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, United States.
S KathSchool of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.
M McCulloughDepartment of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.
D PaulSchool of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.
P KanokvimankulDepartment of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.
T X NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, United States.
F LiSchool of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States.

Funding

HashtagHealth: A Social Media Big Data Resource for Neighborhood Effects ResearchK01ES025433 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI NGUYEN, QUYNH · 2014 to 2018
$816k
NIEHS NIH HHS K01 ES025433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesContextual factors can influence health through exposures to health-promoting and risk-inducing factors. The aim of this study was to (1) build, from geotagged Twitter and Yelp data, a national food environment database and (2) to test associations between state food environment indicators and health outcomes. STUDY

designThis is a cross-sectional study based upon secondary analyses of publicly available data.

methodsUsing Twitter's Streaming Application Programming Interface (API), we collected and processed 4,041,521 food-related, geotagged tweets between April 2015 and March 2016. Using Yelp's Search API, we collected data on 505,554 unique food-related businesses. In linear regression models, we examined associations between food environment characteristics and state-level health outcomes, controlling for state-level differences in age, percent non-Hispanic white, and median household income.

resultsA one standard deviation increase in caloric density of food tweets was related to higher all-cause mortality (+46.50 per 100,000), diabetes (+0.75%), obesity (+1.78%), high cholesterol (+1.40%), and fair/poor self-rated health (2.01%). More burger Yelp listings were related to higher prevalence of diabetes (+0.55%), obesity (1.35%), and fair/poor self-rated health (1.12%). More alcohol tweets and Yelp bars and pub listings were related to higher state-level binge drinking and heavy drinking, but lower mortality and lower percent reporting fair/poor self-rated health. Supplemental analyses with county-level social media indicators and county health outcomes resulted in finding similar but slightly attenuated associations compared to those found at the state level.

conclusionsSocial media can be utilized to create indicators of the food environment that are associated with area-level mortality, health behaviors, and chronic conditions.

Indexed as

EnvironmentFoodHealth BehaviorSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesChronic diseaseData miningFood and nutritionGeographySocial determinantsSocial media

Identifiers

PMID28478354
PMCPMC5492981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.