Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477622›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

Optimized animal model to mimic the reality of stress-induced depression in the clinic.

Yi Zhang, Yuting Wang, Hui Lei, Lei Wang, Liang Xue, Xin Wang, Xiongzhao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Study of the Effects ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  7. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. mGluR5 Facilitates Long-Term Synaptic Depression in a Stress-Induced Depressive Mouse Model.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yi ZhangMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Yuting WangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Maternal and Child health Hospital of Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan, 410008, China.
Hui LeiCollege of Education, Hunan Agriculture University, Changsha, 410128, People's Republic of China.
Lei WangMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Liang XueMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Xin WangMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Xiongzhao ZhuMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China. xiongzhaozhu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal models are useful tools for verifying the relationship between stress and depression; however, an operational criterion for excluding the resilient animals from the analysis has not been established yet, which hinders the model's ability to more accurately mimic the scenario in humans.

methodsTo induce depression-like symptoms, rats received maternal deprivation (MD) during PND1-14, and/or chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) exposure. The latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to determine latent subgroups in treatment naive adult rats. The percentile method was used to distinguish sensitive and non-sensitive behaviors in rats.

resultsThe sucrose preference rate of treatment naive adult rats was fit using a Beta distribution, while immobility time was fit using a Gamma distribution. Indexes of behavioral tests revealed the 4-class model as the best fit for treatment naive adult rats. The incidence of stress-resilience in MD rats was significantly higher than that in CUS rats and MD + CUS rats. There was a significantly higher incidence of stress-resilience in CUS rats compared with MD + CUS rats. Recovery rate of anhedonia-like and sub anhedonia-like behaviors in CUS rats was significantly higher than that in MD and MD + CUS rats. There was a significantly higher recovery rate of anhedonia-like behaviors in MD rats compared to MD + CUS rats.

conclusionsThe percentile method is suitable for setting up an operational cutoff to classify depression-like, sub depression-like, and resilient behaviors in rats exposed to MD and CUS.

Indexed as

Maternal DeprivationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDepressive DisorderDisease Models, AnimalMaleRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyStress, PsychologicalAnimal modelCutoffDepressionLatent profile analysisPercentile method

Identifiers

PMID28477622
PMCPMC5420406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.