Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477355›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2018

α-Conotoxins active at α3-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and their molecular determinants for selective inhibition.

Hartmut Cuny, Rilei Yu, Han-Shen Tae, Shiva N Kompella, David J Adams

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Marine drugs · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hartmut CunyIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1551-2354
Rilei YuKey Laboratory of Marine Drugs, Chinese Ministry of Education, School of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.
Han-Shen TaeIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8961-7194
Shiva N KompellaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
David J AdamsIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7030-2288
University of Wollongong · AUQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CNThe University of Sydney · AUVictor Chang Cardiac Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal α3-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) and non-neuronal tissues are implicated in a number of severe disease conditions ranging from cancer to cardiovascular diseases and chronic pain. However, despite the physiological characterization of mouse models and cell lines, the precise pathophysiology of nAChRs outside the CNS remains not well understood, in part because there is a lack of subtype-selective antagonists. α-Conotoxins isolated from cone snail venom exhibit characteristic individual selectivity profiles for nAChRs and, therefore, are excellent tools to study the determinants for nAChR-antagonist interactions. Given that human α3β4 subtype selective α-conotoxins are scarce and this is a major nAChR subtype in the PNS, the design of new peptides targeting this nAChR subtype is desirable. Recent studies using α-conotoxins RegIIA and AuIB, in combination with nAChR site-directed mutagenesis and computational modelling, have shed light onto specific nAChR residues, which determine the selectivity of the α-conotoxins for the human α3β2 and α3β4 subtypes. Publications describing the selectivity profile and binding sites of other α-conotoxins confirm that subtype-selective nAChR antagonists often work through common mechanisms by interacting with the same structural components and sites on the receptor. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed section on Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.11/issuetoc.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesConotoxinsHumansModels, MolecularNicotinic AntagonistsReceptors, NicotinicConotoxinsNicotinic AntagonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID28477355
PMCPMC5979624
OpenAlexW2610395588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.