Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477297›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2017

Engaging rural communities in genetic research: challenges and opportunities.

Caress Dean, Amanda J Fogleman, Whitney E Zahnd, Alexander E Lipka, Ripan Singh Malhi, Kristin R Delfino, Wiley D Jenkins

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Caress DeanCenter for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 201 E. Madison St., Springfield, IL, 62794-9664, USA.
Amanda J FoglemanCenter for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 201 E. Madison St., Springfield, IL, 62794-9664, USA.
Whitney E ZahndCenter for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 201 E. Madison St., Springfield, IL, 62794-9664, USA.
Alexander E LipkaDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, W-201B Turner Hall, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Ripan Singh MalhiDepartments of Anthropology & Animal Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 209F Davenport Hall, 607 Matthews Ave., Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Kristin R DelfinoCenter for Clinical Research, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 201 E. Madison St., Springfield, IL, 62794-9664, USA.
Wiley D JenkinsPopulation Health Science Program, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 201 E. Madison St, Springfield, IL, 62794-9664, USA. wjenkins@siumed.edu.
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USGoodwin College · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical analyses of health and disease in rural communities is frequently limited by low sample counts. Still, some studies indicate increased risk for some diseases even after adjustment for known risk factors. It has been hypothesized that the context of community formation in rural areas facilitates the propagation of genetic founder effects-potentially impacting disease susceptibility. However, outright examination of genetic diversity in such communities has not been performed. Our objective was to engage otherwise research-inexperienced rural communities of largely European descent in genomic research in the context of cancer susceptibility. From September 2015 to February 2016, we implemented a systematic process of progressive community engagement. This iterative method sought project buy-in from first the town mayor, then village council. If approved by both, a focus group of community members examined how residents might view the research, informed consent and specimen collection, and issues of privacy. We were successful in engaging three of the four communities approached for the research project. There was universal enthusiasm for the project by all mayors and village councils. The focus groups' main point of discussion involved wording in the informed consent, with little concern regarding the research question or privacy. Perhaps contrary to popular thought, we found each community we approached to be both welcoming and enthusiastic about collaborating in research on genomic diversity. The systematic method of engagement did much to preserve community respect and autonomy and facilitated buy-in.

Indexed as

CancerFocus groupsGeneticsRural

Identifiers

PMID28477297
PMCPMC5496842
OpenAlexW2610713301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.