Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477207›Full record

ReviewEURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology2017

From protein-protein interactions to protein co-expression networks: a new perspective to evaluate large-scale proteomic data.

Danila Vella, Italo Zoppis, Giancarlo Mauri, Pierluigi Mauri, Dario Di Silvestre

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Uncovering Protein Networks in Cardiovascular Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Danila VellaInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (ITB-CNR), 93 Fratelli Cervi, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Italo ZoppisDepartment of Computer Science, Systems and Communication DiSCo, University of Milano-Bicocca, 336 Viale Sarca, Milan, Italy.
Giancarlo MauriDepartment of Computer Science, Systems and Communication DiSCo, University of Milano-Bicocca, 336 Viale Sarca, Milan, Italy.
Pierluigi MauriInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (ITB-CNR), 93 Fratelli Cervi, Segrate, Milan, Italy.
Dario Di SilvestreInstitute for Biomedical Technologies - National Research Council (ITB-CNR), 93 Fratelli Cervi, Segrate, Milan, Italy. dario.disilvestre@itb.cnr.it.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITInstitute of Biomedical Technologies · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reductionist approach of dissecting biological systems into their constituents has been successful in the first stage of the molecular biology to elucidate the chemical basis of several biological processes. This knowledge helped biologists to understand the complexity of the biological systems evidencing that most biological functions do not arise from individual molecules; thus, realizing that the emergent properties of the biological systems cannot be explained or be predicted by investigating individual molecules without taking into consideration their relations. Thanks to the improvement of the current -omics technologies and the increasing understanding of the molecular relationships, even more studies are evaluating the biological systems through approaches based on graph theory. Genomic and proteomic data are often combined with protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks whose structure is routinely analyzed by algorithms and tools to characterize hubs/bottlenecks and topological, functional, and disease modules. On the other hand, co-expression networks represent a complementary procedure that give the opportunity to evaluate at system level including organisms that lack information on PPIs. Based on these premises, we introduce the reader to the PPI and to the co-expression networks, including aspects of reconstruction and analysis. In particular, the new idea to evaluate large-scale proteomic data by means of co-expression networks will be discussed presenting some examples of application. Their use to infer biological knowledge will be shown, and a special attention will be devoted to the topological and module analysis.

Indexed as

Co-expression network-Omics dataPearson’s correlationPPI networkSystems biologyTopological analysisWGCNA

Identifiers

PMID28477207
PMCPMC5359264
OpenAlexW2599029890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.