Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477155›Full record

ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2017

The cuticular nature of corneal lenses in Drosophila melanogaster.

Aaron L Stahl, Mark Charlton-Perkins, Elke K Buschbeck, Tiffany A Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development genes and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cell-Mediated Branch Fusion in the Drosophila Trachea.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Matrix biology plus · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron L StahlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Mark Charlton-PerkinsDivision of Developmental Biology and Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Elke K BuschbeckDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA. elke.buschbeck@uc.edu.
Tiffany A CookCenter of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. tiffany.cook2@wayne.edu.
University of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBWayne State University · US

Funding

Pros/Prox1 and Lens Development R01EY017907 · NEI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI COOK, TIFFANY · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Defining Glial Programs that Support Adult Photoreceptor Form and FunctionR21EY024405 · NEI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, TIFFANY · 2014 to 2015
$425k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017907NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dioptric visual system relies on precisely focusing lenses that project light onto a neural retina. While the proteins that constitute the lenses of many vertebrates are relatively well characterized, less is known about the proteins that constitute invertebrate lenses, especially the lens facets in insect compound eyes. To address this question, we used mass spectrophotometry to define the major proteins that comprise the corneal lenses from the adult Drosophila melanogaster compound eye. This led to the identification of four cuticular proteins: two previously identified lens proteins, drosocrystallin and retinin, and two newly identified proteins, Cpr66D and Cpr72Ec. To determine which ommatidial cells contribute each of these proteins to the lens, we conducted in situ hybridization at 50% pupal development, a key age for lens secretion. Our results confirm previous reports that drosocrystallin and retinin are expressed in the two primary corneagenous cells-cone cells and primary pigment cells. Cpr72Ec and Cpr66D, on the other hand, are more highly expressed in higher order interommatidial pigment cells. These data suggest that the complementary expression of cuticular proteins give rise to the center vs periphery of the corneal lens facet, possibly facilitating a refractive gradient that is known to reduce spherical aberration. Moreover, these studies provide a framework for future studies aimed at understanding the cuticular basis of corneal lens function in holometabolous insect eyes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCompound Eye, ArthropodCorneaCrystallinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularEye ProteinsGene Expression RegulationIn Situ HybridizationLens, CrystallineMass SpectrometryPupaCrystallinsDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsCompound eyeCone cellsCuticular proteinsPigment cellsSemper cells

Identifiers

PMID28477155
PMCPMC5581546
OpenAlexW2610582002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.