Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477147›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2017

High Interspecimen Variability in Engagement of the Anterolateral Ligament: An In Vitro Cadaveric Study.

Robert N Kent, James F Boorman-Padgett, Ran Thein, Jelle P van der List, Danyal H Nawabi, Thomas L Wickiewicz, Carl W Imhauser, Andrew D Pearle

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Minimal influence of the anterolateral knee ligament on anterior and rotational laxity of the knee: a cadaveric study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert N KentDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 510 E 73rd Street, New York, 10021, NY, USA. bobbykent14@gmail.com.
James F Boorman-PadgettDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 510 E 73rd Street, New York, 10021, NY, USA.
Ran TheinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Jelle P van der ListDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Danyal H NawabiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas L WickiewiczDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Carl W ImhauserDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 510 E 73rd Street, New York, 10021, NY, USA.
Andrew D PearleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction as an adjunct to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains a subject of clinical debate. This uncertainty may be driven in part by a lack of knowledge regarding where, within the range of knee motion, the ALL begins to carry force (engages). QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does the ALL engage in the ACL-intact knee; and (2) where within the range of anterior tibial translation occurring in the ACL-sectioned knee does the ALL engage?

methodsA robotic manipulator was used to measure anterior tibial translation, ACL forces, and ALL forces in 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (10 donors; mean age, 41 ± 16 years; range, 20-64 years; eight male) in response to applied multiplanar torques. The engagement point of the ALL was defined as the anterior tibial translation at which the ALL began to carry at least 15% of the force carried by the native ACL; a threshold of 15% minimized the sensitivity of the engagement point of the ALL. This engagement point was compared with the maximum anterior tibial translation permitted in the ACL-intact condition using a paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Normality of each outcome measure was confirmed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (p < 0.05).

resultsThe ALL engaged in five and four of 10 ACL-intact knees in response to multiplanar torques at 15° and 30° of flexion, respectively. Among the nine of 10 knees in which the ALL engaged with the ACL sectioned, the ACL-intact motion limit, and ALL engagement point, respectively, averaged 1.5 ± 1.1 mm and 5.4 ± 4.1 mm at 15° of flexion and 2.0 ± 1.3 mm and 5.7 ± 2.7 mm at 30° of flexion. Thus, the ALL engaged 3.8 ± 3.1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-6.3 mm; p = 0.027) and 3.7 ± 2.4 mm (95% CI, 2.1-5.3 mm; p = 0.008) beyond the maximum anterior tibial translation of the ACL-intact knee at 15° and 30° of flexion, respectively.

conclusionsIn this in vitro, cadaveric study, the ALL engaged in up to half of the ACL-intact knees. In the ACL-sectioned knees, the ALL engaged beyond the ACL-intact limit of anterior subluxation on average in response to multiplanar torques, albeit with variability that likely reflects interspecimen heterogeneity in ALL anatomy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that surgical variables such as the joint position and tension at which lateral extraarticular grafts and tenodeses are fixed might be able to be tuned to control where within the range of knee motion the graft tissue is engaged to restrain joint motion on a patient-specific basis.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverFemaleHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKnee JointLigaments, ArticularMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRoboticsStress, MechanicalTorqueYoung AdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Tibial TranslationEngagement PointFlexion Angle

Identifiers

PMID28477147
PMCPMC5599392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.