Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28477042›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Unintentional drifts during quiet stance and voluntary body sway.

Omid Rasouli, Stanisław Solnik, Mariusz P Furmanek, Daniele Piscitelli, Ali Falaki, Mark L Latash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Unintentional force drifts in the lower extremities.Experimental brain research · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omid RasouliDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Stanisław SolnikUniversity of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, USA.
Mariusz P FurmanekDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec.Hall-268N, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Daniele PiscitelliDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec.Hall-268N, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Ali FalakiDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec.Hall-268N, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mark L LatashDepartment of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, Rec.Hall-268N, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. mll11@psu.edu.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
THE ORGANIZATION OF A SIMPLE SYNERGYR01NS035032 · NINDS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI LATASH, MARK L · 1997 to 2015
$4.3M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002016 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI THOMAS, GAIL D. · 2016 to 2025
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored unintentional drifts in voluntary whole-body sway tasks following the removal of visual feedback. The main hypothesis was that the unintentional drifts were produced by drifts of referent coordinates for salient performance variables. Young healthy subjects stood quietly on a force platform and also performed voluntary body sway at 0.5 Hz both in the anterio-posterior and medio-lateral directions. Visual feedback on the center of pressure (COP) coordinate was provided and then turned off. During quiet stance trials, the subjects matched the initial COP coordinate with a target shifted by 3 cm anterior, posterior, left, or right from the coordinate during natural standing and activated the right tibialis anterior to 30% of its maximal voluntary contraction. During cyclical voluntary sway task, the nominal sway amplitude was always 4 cm while the midpoint was at one of the four mentioned locations. Removing visual feedback caused COP drifts during quiet stance trials that were consistent across trials performed by a subject but could be in opposite directions across subjects; there was a consistent drop in the activation level of tibialis anterior. During voluntary body sway, removing visual feedback caused a consistent increase in the voluntary sway amplitude and a drift of the midpoint that was consistent within but not across subjects. Motor equivalent and non-motor equivalent inter-cycle motion components were quantified within the space of muscle groups (muscle modes) under visual feedback and at the end of the period without visual feedback. Throughout the trial, there were large motor equivalent motion components, and they increased over the period without visual feedback. The results corroborate the idea that referent coordinate drifts at different levels of the control hierarchy can lead to unintentional drifts in performance. It suggests that directions of COP drifts are defined by two main factors, drift of the body referent coordinate toward the actual coordinate (that can lead to fall) and an opposite drift to ensure body motion to a safer location. Analysis of motor equivalence suggests that postural stability is not compromised during unintentional drifts in performance in contrast to earlier studies of multi-finger tasks. This may be due to the vital importance of postural stability for everyday actions.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFeedback, SensoryFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMovementMuscle, SkeletalPostural BalancePosturePsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultDriftMotor equivalencePostureReferent coordinateSway

Identifiers

PMID28477042
PMCPMC5506379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.