ReviewDer Internist2017
[Response to and further development of the Choosing wisely initiative].
Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Choosing wisely initiative of the German Society of Internal Medicine ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin," DGIM) and its 12 core focus area specialist societies were brought into being in 2014. The German initiative differs from the American campaign in that it not only considers overuse of diagnostic and therapeutic healthcare services, but also addresses procedures which are frequently not performed although they would bring benefits for patients. Furthermore, the recommendations were approved by an interdisciplinary consensus commission under consideration of all key internal medicine aspects. Since 2014, the initiative has received widespread attention. The 115 recommendations approved by the consensus commission have meanwhile been published in 20 articles. An array of measures were subsequently adopted to further promote the Choosing wisely recommendations ("Klug-entscheiden-Empfehlungen," KEE). These include the systematic incorporation of KEE symposia into DGIM annual congresses and the congresses of the core focus area specialist societies, as well as consideration of the KEE during establishment of future guidelines. Particular attention was paid to the importance of initiating and promoting a research project aimed at familiarizing medical students with the principles and content of the Choosing wisely initiative. The decision for or against specific diagnostic and therapeutic procedures represents an essential medical competence, which should therefore be trained prior to qualification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28477038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.