Development and

Lakshminarayana Turuvekere SadguruPrasad, Basavaraj Madhusudhan, Prakash Kodihalli B, Prahlad Chandra Ghosh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in IET nanobiotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lakshminarayana Turuvekere SadguruPrasadResearch Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Department of Biochemistry and Food Technology, Davangere University, Davangere 577002, Karnataka, India.

Basavaraj MadhusudhanDepartment of Biochemistry, Kuvempu University, P.G. Centre, Shivagangotri, Davanagere 577002, Karnataka, India. madhusudhanbasavaraj@gmail.com.

Prakash Kodihalli BDepartment of Biochemistry, Kuvempu University, P.G. Centre, Shivagangotri, Davanagere 577002, Karnataka, India.

Prahlad Chandra GhoshDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi 110021, India.

Kuvempu University · INDavangere University · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer with remarkable properties and merits are being preferred in various biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility, non-toxicity and cost effectiveness. In this investigation, oxytetracycline-loaded PMMA nanoparticles were prepared using nano-precipitation method for the treatment of anaplasmosis. The prepared nanoparticles were characterised using dynamic light scattering (DLS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The mean average diameter of the nanoparticles ranged between 190-240 nm and zeta potential was found to be -19 mV. The drug loading capacity and entrapment efficiency of nanoparticles was found varied between 33.7-62.2% and 40.5-60.0%. The

Indexed as

Absorption, PhysicochemicalAdministration, OralAnaplasmosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCells, CulturedDelayed-Action PreparationsDiffusionErythrocytesHumansNanocapsulesOxytetracyclineParticle SizePlasmodium falciparumPolymethyl MethacrylateAnti-Bacterial AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsNanocapsulesOxytetracyclinePolymethyl Methacrylate

Identifiers

PMID28476972

DOI10.1049/iet-nbt.2016.0061

PMCPMC8676619

OpenAlexW2556319573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.